International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

Effect of Organizational and Interpersonal Dimensions on Workplace Deviant Behaviour among Government Officers in Putrajaya

Open access
Workplace deviant behavior is the issue of universal that involves multiple organizations and various group of workers, whether there is support or professional. This problem of deviant behavior brings negative implications to the organization socially and economically. This study aims to determine the level of workplace deviant behavior among government officers in Putrajaya. This study also conducted to compare the significant differences in workplace deviant behaviour among selected social demographic variables (age, gender, marital status, position, level of education and tenure in service). This is a quantitative study which used simple random sampling technique to dictate the number of respondents. There are 380 samples which consists of government officers in grade 41 to grade 54 from 22 ministries in Putrajaya. The result indicated that the level of workplace deviant behaviour among the government officers in Putrajaya was low. For demographic factors, the current study found that, there were no significant differences in WDB among the respondents with different age, gender, marital status, position, level of education and tenure in service.
Alias, M. (2013). Predictors of workplace deviant behaviour and the mediating role of job satisfaction. Thesis University Putra Malaysia (UPM): Malaysia.
Appelbaum, S. H., Deguire, K. J., & Lay, M. (2005), The relationship of ethical climate to deviant workplace behaviour. The International Journal of Business in Society. 5 (4): 43-55.
Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential cause. Aggressive Behaviour, 22 (3): 161-173.
Bennet, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000), Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3); 349-360.
Bolin, A., & Heatherly L. (2001), Predictors of employee deviance: The relationship between bad attitudes and bad behaviour. Journal of Business and Psychology, 15(3):405-418.
Dunlop, P. D., & Lee, K. (2004), Workplace deviance, organisational citizenship behaviour and business unit performance. The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 25(1), 67-80.
Estes, B., & Wang, J. (2008). Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organisational performance. Human Resource Development Review, 7 (2):218-240.
Everton, W. J., Jolton, J. A., & Mastrangelo, J. A. (2007), Be nice and fair or else: understanding reasons for employees deviant behaviour, Journal of Management Development, 26(2): 117-131. Retrieved 12 March 2019 from https:// www.emerald.com/ insight/content/doi/10.1108/02621710710726035/full/html.
Gruys, M. L., & Sackett, P. R. (2003), Investigating the dimensionality of counterproductive work behaviour, International Journal of Selection and Assessment 11(1): 31-42.
Gruys, M. L. (1999), The dimensionality of deviant employee behaviour in the workplace, PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota, USA.
Harvey, M. G., Heames, J. T., Richey, R. G., & Leonard, N. (2006) Bullying: From the Playground to the Boardroom. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12(4):1-11
Hollinger, R. C. (1986). Acts against the workplace: social bonding and employee deviance. Deviant Behaviour. 7: 53-75.
Hunt, S. T. (1996) Generic work behaviour: An Investigation into the dimensions of entry-level, hourly job performance. Personnel Psychology. 49, 51-83.
Jones, J. W. (1980). Attitudinal correlates of employees’ deviance: Theft, alcohol us, and nonprescribed drug use. Psychological Reports. 47, 71-77.
Kessler & Spector. (2007). Encyclopedia of industrial organizational psychology; Sage.
Mangione, T. W., & Quinn, R. P. (1975). Job satisfaction, counter-productive behaviour and drug use at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 114-116.
Radzali F. M. (2015). Factors associated with workplace deviant behaviour in a public organization in Malaysia and moderating role of religiosity. Master Thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Raelin, J. A. (1994). Three scales of professional deviance within organizations. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 15, 483-501.
Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. (1996). Monkey see, monkey do: The role of role models in predicting workplace aggression. In J.B Keys & L.N. Dosier (Eds.). Academy of Management 1996(1):288-292.
Robinson, S.L., & Bennet, R.J. (1995), A typology of deviant workplace behaviours: A multidimensional scaling study. Academic of Management Journal 38(2), 555-572.
Robinson, S. N., Robertson, J. C., & Curtis, M. B. (2012) The Effects of Contextual and Wrongdoing Attributes on Organizational Employees' Whistleblowing Intentions Following Fraud,. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(2):213-227
Schwab, K. (2018). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018 retreived 30 August 2018 from http://reports.weforum.org/global - competitiveness - index -2017 -2018 / competitiveness -rankings/
Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997), Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
Slora, K. B. (1989). An Empirical approach to determining employee deviance base rates. Journal of Business and Psychology, 4(2), 199-218.
Yogeswary, S. (2009). Relationship between organization ethical climate and workplace deviant behaviour. Unpublished Master Dissertation. Business College, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia.
In-Text Citation: (Bachok et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Bachok, A., Silva, J. L. D., & Zawawi, D. (2022). Effect of Organizational and Interpersonal Dimensions on Workplace Deviant Behaviour among Government Officers in Putrajaya. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 12(13), 117- 128.