Instructional assessment plays a crucial role in enhancing student learning and teachers' instructional practices. Despite extensive research on teaching assessment, there remains to be a significant gap between theory and practice. This review employs qualitative research methods to explore strategies for improving student learning and teacher instruction through enhanced teaching assessment practices, with a focus on specific and practical strategies. The study found that improvements in curriculum assessment strategies can effectively enhance both teaching quality and student learning outcomes. This study aims to enrich relevant educational theories and substantially improve both student learning outcomes and teacher instructional practices through the implementation of practical, strategy-based assessment methods.
Admiraal, W., van Vugt, F., Kranenburg, F., Koster, B., Smit, B., Weijers, S., Lockhorst, D. (2017). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology into K–12 instruction: evaluation of a technology-infused approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 105-120.
Ali, M. (2023). Personalized learning in higher education for health sciences: a scoping review protocol.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2990211/v1
Ali, M. (2024). Personalised learning in higher education for health sciences: a scoping review protocol.Systematic Reviews, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02478-4
An empirical study on several factors affecting the results of student evaluation of teaching. Chinese Higher Education Evaluation, (3), 37-41.
Archer, E. (2017). The assessment purpose triangle: balancing the purposes of educational assessment. Frontiers in Education, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00041
Atoum, M., Alsaggar, M., & Tubaishat, T. (2022). Utilization level of assessment strategies among arts education teachers of elementary stage. Dirasat Educational Sciences, 49(3), 448-462. https://doi.org/10.35516/edu.v49i3.2351
B. (2022). Comparison of the assessment of teaching components during distance and traditional learning – perspective of academic teachers and students questionnaire survey. Journal of Education Health and Sport, 13(1), 66-70. https://doi.org/10.12775/jehs.2023.13.01.010
Benning, I., & Davis, E. K. (2023). Graduate students’ experiences and evaluation of online instruction. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100597. Chicago
Brown, G. T. (2022). The past, present and future of educational assessment: A transdisciplinary perspective. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 7, p. 1060633). Frontiers Media SA.
Chapman, C., & King, R. (2005). Differentiated assessment strategies: One tool doesn't fit all. Corwin Press.
Jingwen, C. (2005). Course evaluation. Fujian Education Press. Fan, T., Song, J., & Guan, Z. (2021). Integrating diagnostic assessment into curriculum: a theoretical framework and teaching practices. Language Testing in Asia,11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-00117-y
Teng, F. M. (2023). 8 Language Learning Strategies. In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition: Theories, Assessment and Pedagogy (pp. 147-174). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614514749-008
Glaser, R., Chudowsky, N., & Pellegrino, J. W. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academies Press.
Govaerts, M., Van der Vleuten, C., & Schut, S. (2022). Implementation of programmatic assessment: challenges and lessons learned. Education Sciences, 12(10), 717.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments improve learning. On Formative Assessment: Readings from Educational Leadership (EL Essentials).
Hawkins, J., Catalano, R., & Miller, J. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: implications for substance abuse prevention.. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64-105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64
He, Q., Gao, G., Wu, Q., & Cui, Y. (2022). Application value of the workshop practice teaching method based on target-oriented study modules on the internet in orthopedic rehabilitation. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2022, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5166219
Jonsson, A., & Svingby, G. (2007). The use of scoring rubrics: Reliability, validity and educational consequences. Educational research review, 2(2), 130-144.
Kahaleh, A. A., Danielson, J., Franson, K. L., Nuffer, W. A., & Umland, E. M. (2015). An interprofessional education panel on development, implementation, and assessment strategies. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 79(6), 78.
Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into preservice education: A review of the literature. Journal of research on technology in education, 38(4), 383-408.
Kolitch, E., & Dean, A. V. (1999). Student ratings of instruction in the USA: Hidden assumptions and missing conceptions about ‘goods teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 24(1), 27-42.
Lee, L. J., Connolly, M. E., Dancy, M. H., Henderson, C. R., & Christensen, W. M. (2018). A comparison of student evaluations of instruction vs. students' conceptual learning gains. American Journal of Physics, 86(7), 531-535.
Li Zhongfei. (2002). Exploration and practice of student evaluation of teaching.
Liu Guoying. (2006). Statistical analysis of articles published in Journal of Huaibei Coal Teachers College (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition).
Liu, O. L. (2012). Student evaluation of instruction: In the new paradigm of distance education. Research in Higher Education, 53, 471-486.
Meiklejohn, S., Anderson, A., Brock, T., Kumar, A., Maddock, B., Wright, C., ... & Kent, F. (2023). The utility of an interprofessional education framework and its impacts upon perceived readiness of graduates for collaborative practice. A multimethod evaluation using the context, input, process, product (CIPP) model. Nurse Education Today, 121, 105707.
Michael, E. L., Ennis, R. P., Jolivette, K., & Sanders, S. (2022). Setting the stage: The importance of effective assessment for strategy instruction and self-regulation in implementation and research. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 66(4), 297-300.
Michael, E. L., Ray, A., & McKeown, D. (2022). Assessment for effective strategy instruction in writing. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 66(4), 327-332.
M?odawski, J., ?wiercz, A., Mlodawska, M., PI?TA, A., Grzegorz, S., & Gawdzik,
on academic performance: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 37, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100484
Owan, V. J., Abang, K. B., Idika, D. O., Etta, E. O., & Bassey, B. A. (2023). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence tools in educational measurement and assessment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. Modestum LTD. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13428
Qiao Yuxiang. (2005). Theory and practice of student evaluation of teaching. China Agricultural Education, (2), 38-40.
Rocha, A. C., Silva, M., & Duarte, C. (2022). How is sexuality education for adolescents evaluated? A systematic review based on the Context, Input, Process and Product (CIPP) model. Sex Education, 22(2), 198-216.
Rollins, L. H., Sanders, S., Jolivette, K., & Virgin, A. S. (2022). Assessment of strategy instruction and self-regulation in reading comprehension: A review of the literature. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 66(4), 301-311.
Shaheen, N. A., Khurshid, N. D. F., & Khan, N. D. M. S. (2020). Technology Enhanced formative assessment for students’ motivation in mathematics at elementary level. Sir Syed Journal of Education & Social Research, 3(3), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol3- iss3-2020(335-344
Sundberg, M. D. (2002). Assessing student learning. Cell Biology Education, 1(1), 11-15.
Thomas, M. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about classroom assessment and their selection of classroom assessment strategies. Journal of Research & Reflections in Education (JRRE), 6(2).
Toosi, M., Modarres, M., Amini, M., & Geranmayeh, M. (2021). Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model in medical education: A systematic review. Journal of education and health promotion, 10(1).
Tunç, F. (2010). Evaluation of an english language teaching program at A Public University using CIPP model [M.S. - Master of Science]. Middle East Technical University.
Ukoh, E. E., & Onifade, S. A. (2020). Pre-lesson assignments and formative assessment strategies with interactive invention instruction on low achievers in physics. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v4i1.3846
Binhua, W. (1998). Developmental teacher evaluation system.
Dumei, W. (1996). Analysis of the effectiveness and stability of student evaluation of teaching. Jiangsu Higher Education, (2), 23-26.
Xue Ping. (2006). Problems and counter measures in the practice of college student evaluation of teaching. Journal of Shanxi Provincial Party School of the Communist Party of China, 29(3), 143-144.
Yan, Z., Lao, H., Panadero, E., Fernández-Castilla, B., Yang, L., & Yang, M. (2022). Effects of self-assessment and peer-assessment interventions
Zhao, J., & Gallant, D. J. (2012). Student evaluation of instruction in higher education: Exploring issues of validity and reliability. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 227-235.
Zhijun, Z. (2005). Factors affecting the results of student evaluation of teaching and improvement measures. Journal of Huaibei Coal Teachers College: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 26(2), 157-160.
(Zou et al., 2024)
Zou, Y., Yuan, M., Mo, L., & Mustakim, S. S. B. (2024). Enhancing Teaching and Learning through Assessment Strategies: A Practical Guide. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(7), 1028–1040.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
