Purpose: The relationship between maturity and participation is studied in the Environmental Organization in Qazvin province.
Methodology: This survey was conducted using descriptive-correlational method. Allen and Mayer's commitment questionnaire, Miner and Smith's motivation questionnaire and Mishra's organizational trust questionnaire were tools of data collection. The statistical population included 55 persons. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software.
Findings: Members of group R4 had more readiness and offered more suggestions. In other words, the highest number of suggestions is related to group R4 that the members had the highest readiness. Group R3 was the next group that offered more suggestions than group R2. Finally, there was group R1.
Conclusion: Employees who were at a higher maturity level participated more in suggestions and offered a higher number of suggestions. Scores obtained by each person were averaged and the relation with average of scores was explored. The obtained results are as same as sum of scores and individuals with higher maturity participate more in the firm.
1. San Juan S. P. (1998). Team building: a leadership strategy. J Philipp Dent Assoc, 50(1):49-55.
2. Perra, B. M. (2000). Leadership: the key to quality outcomes. Nurs Adm Q, 24(2):56-61
3. Sorrentino E. A, Nalli B. (1992). The effect of head nurse behaviors on nurse job satisfaction and performance. Hosp Health Serv Adm, 37 (1): 103-13.
4. Dunham-Taylor J. (2000). Nurse executive transformational leadership found in participative organizations. Journal of Nursing Administration
- Appleby, A. & Mavin, S.(2000), Innovation not imitation: human resource strategy and the impact on world-class status.” Total Quality Management 11.
5. -Becker, B. & Gerhart, B.(1996), The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects. Academy of Management Journal 39, 4:779-801.
6. -Becker, B. E. & Huselid, M. A.(1998), High Performance Work Systems and Firm Performance: A Synthesis of Research and Managerial Implications, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management Vol, 16,: 53-101.
7. -Curtis,hefly&miller(2001). People capability maturity model,version 2.
8. -Huselid, M. A.(1995), The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance, Academy of Management Journal, 38:635-672.
9. -Hannon, J. M. & Milkovich, G. T.(1996), The Effect of Human Resource Reputation Signals on Share Prices: An Event Study, Human Resources Management 35, 3: 405-424.
10. -Miller,s.curtis,B&Hefley, w.(2003), Improving Workforce Capabilities with the People Capability Maturity Model.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
