Language learning strategies are essential in learning a language to enhance language acquisition, optimize learning outcomes, and empower learners with effective tools to navigate and communicate in a new language. Language learning strategy preference refers to the individual's tendency to gravitate towards some strategies that they prefer the most. The main purpose of this research being conducted was to identify the language learning strategies preferred by the students. This study was carried out to a total of 30 respondents from Tamil school background. The method used to collect data was a quantitative research design to study about the cognitive and affective strategies and identify the preferred strategies between cognitive and affective strategies. This study utilized quantitative data and involved descriptive analysis. The results showed that cognitive strategies are more preferred than affective strategies. However, this study highlights the significance of both cognitive and affective strategies in language learning. By striking a balance between these strategies, educators can create comprehensive language learning experiences that cater to students' cognitive and emotional needs. The findings offer valuable guidance for educators to design effective language learning programmes that could optimize language learning outcomes among pupils.
Abu Radwan, A. (2020). Changes in prospective teachers’ beliefs about foreign language learning in a teacher training program. Journal of Arts and Social Sciences [JASS], 10(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.24200/jass.vol10iss2pp37-48
Boon, H. J. (2011). School Movies, Coping, and Achievement: Models of Possible Interactions. The Journal of Education Research, 104(1), 54-
70.https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903567372)
Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41(3), 221-238.
Capous-Desyllas, M., Bromfield, N. F., Nava, A., & Barnes, B. (2020). Teaching note—Strategies for enhancing writing among first-generation social work students: Reflections on the use of peer writing mentors. Journal of Social Work Education, 57(1), 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2020.1798314
Dinsmore, D., & Fryer, L. (2019). Developing Learners’ Cognitive Strategies and the Motivation to Use Them: Rethinking Education Policy. 10.1177/2372732219860862.
Franquesa-Soler, M., Barraza, L., & Serio-Silva, J. C. (2018). Children’s learning preferences for the development of conservation education programs in Mexican communities. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(1), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1427038
Neimeyer G. J., & Neimeyer, R. A. (Eds.), Advances in Personal Construct Psychology: A Research Annual, Volume 8 (pp. 139-160). Praeger Publishers.
KARSL?, V., & YA?IZ, O. (2022). Examination of the pre-service teachers’ experiences and perceptions on teaching practices: English language teaching case. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9um4y
Kiener, M., Weaver, C. (2011). Examining How Cognitive and Affective Learning Strategies Change as Student Complete Coursework.
King, R. B., & Areepattamannil, S. (2014). What Students Feel in School Influences the Strategies They Use for Learning: Academic Emotions and Cognitive/Meta-Cognitive Strategies. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 8(1), 18–27.
https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2014.3
Li, S., & Chun, H. (2012). The use of language learning strategies in EFL contexts by grade eight students in China. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 213-232.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., Artelt, C., Baumert, J., & Peschar, J. L. (2006). OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: Cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. International Journal of Testing, 6(4), 311-360.
Masitowarni, Siregar & Haswani, Fahri. (2020). Learner Types and Their Preferences in Learning English. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal. 3. 777-783. 10.33258/birle.v3i2.939.
Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning and instruction. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.
Mkonto, N. (2015). Students' Learning Preferences. Journal of Studies in Education. 5. 212 -232. 10.5296/jse.v5i3.8125.
Ormrod, J. E. (2007). Human Learning. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education
Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293-316.
Peši?, D. (2022). Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies in Foreign Language Listening Comprehension at The Studies of Tourism – Students’ Preference and University Lecturers’ Utility Rating. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Sciemce, Engineering and Education, 10(2), 89-99.https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-2-89-99
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyckx, K., & Goossens, L. (2012). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Developmental Psychology, 48(6), 1839-1852.
Spolsky, B. (1990). Conditions for second language learning. Oxford University Press.
Vallerand, R. J. (2015). The psychology of passion: A dualistic model. Oxford University Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (2015). Teacher-student relationships and adolescent competence and adjustment:
A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 248-272.
Wijirahayu, Suciana & Dorand, Pietra. (2018). Affective strategies, attitudes, and a model of speaking performance development for engineering students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 948. 012024. 10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012024.
Winn, A. S., DelSignore, L., Marcus, C., Chiel, L., Freiman, E., Stafford, D., Newman, L. (2019). Applying Cognitive Learning Strategies to Enhance Learning and Retention in Clinical Teaching Settings. MedEdPORTAL.1;15:10850. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10850. PMID: 31921996; PMCID: PMC6946583.
