International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

The Role of Maqasid Syariah Knowlegde on E-Zakat Acceptance: Malaysian Evidence

Open access
Islam strongly encourages its followers to use technology and innovation. However, every innovation created will have the opportunity to be rejected by the society. This phenomenon will contribute to waste that are not allowed in Islam. Therefore, this study aims to identify the role of maqasid sharia in explaining the acceptance of the e-zakat system. This study is a quantitative study through the use of questionnaires for data collection. A total of 559 data were analyzed using simple linear regression statistics with the help of SPSS (statistical package for social science).
Abidin, N. Z., Kasimin, H., Idris, S. H. M., & dan Pengurusan, F. E. (2011). e-Kerajaan: Ke Arah Mewujudkan Budaya e-Pengguna Dalam Kalangan Rakyat Malaysia. Prosiding Perkem VI, 1, 181–192.
Al-Jawziyyah, I. Q., & Abi Bakr, M. I. (1973). I’lam al-Muwaqqi’in ‘an Rabb al-‘Alamin. Beirut: Dar Al-Jil.
Al-Syatibi, A. I. (2003). al-Muwafaqat fi Ushul al-Syari’ah. Vol. II (Beirut: Dar Al Kutub Al Ilmiyah, Tt).
Asyur, I. (2001). Maqashid al-Syari’ah al-Islamiyah. Amman: Dâr Al-Nafâ’is.
Awang, M. D., Asutay, M., & Azman Jusoh, M. K. (2014). Understanding of Maslaha and Maqasid al-Shariah concepts on Islamic banking operations in Malaysia. International Conference of Global Islamic Studies 2014, 12–32.
Baazeem, R. M. (2019). The role of religiosity in technology acceptance: the case of privacy in Saudi Arabia. In Censorship, surveillance, and privacy: concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1787–1808). IGI Global.
bin Hajjaj, M. (1998). sahih Muslim. Edt. Ahmad Shams Al-Din. Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-’Ilmiyah.
Ibrahim, M. F. (2016). Analisis Kaedah Bayaran Zakat Harta oleh Institusi Zakat di Malaysia.
Lavrakas, P. (2012). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963947
McCree, D. H., Wingood, G. M., DiClemente, R., Davies, S., & Harrington, K. F. (2003). Religiosity and risky sexual behavior in African-American adolescent females. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(02)00460-3
Osiri, K., Houenou, B., & Stein, R. (2019). A Cross-Country Study of Innovation and Religiosity. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28002.07368
Ozkan, S., Bindusara, G., & Hackney, R. (2010). Facilitating the adoption of e-payment systems: Theoretical constructs and empirical analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410391011036085
Paizin, M. N., & Sarif, S. (2016). KEMUDAHAN PEMBAYARAN ZAKAT: TINJAUAN DI WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN DAN SELANGOR: Keywords: kutipan zakat, saluran bayaran, keberhasilan pungutan zakat. Labuan E-Journal of Muamalat and Society (LJMS), 66–76.
Rahman, M. Z. A. (2015). Aplikasi Maqasid al-Syari ‘ah dalam Pentadbiran Negara: Satu Tinjauan Sejarah Islam. Jurnal Fiqh, 12, 29–56.
Rahmi, N. (2018). Maqasid Al Syari’ah: Melacak Gagasan Awal. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemikiran, 17(2), 160–178.
Taasim, S. I., & Ali, H. (2013). Penerimaan pengguna terhadap kaedah pembayaran elektronik. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 47(1), 3–12.
Umbit, A. F., & Taat, M. S. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan e-pembelajaran dalam kalangan pelajar di institut. Jurnal Penyelidikan IPGK BL, 13, 1–14.
Usman, H., Mulia, D., Chairy, C., & Widowati, N. (2020). Integrating trust, religiosity and image into technology acceptance model: the case of the Islamic philanthropy in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing.
Venkatesh, Morris, Davis, & Davis. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
In-Text Citation: (Karim et al., 2022)
To Cite this Article: Karim, A. H. A., Azalan, N. S., & Mokhtar, M. M. (2022). The Role of Maqasid Syariah Knowlegde on E-Zakat Acceptance: Malaysian Evidence. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 12(12), 1465– 1469.