The subject of the analysis circumscribes to the possibility of applying the principles of the doctrine piercing the corporate veil in the Romanian legal system, which has not yet met a unified legislative approach regarding the extension of shareholders’ liability. Starting from the legal personality the manner it is understood by the Anglo-American law, as the legal liability of shareholders in certain company forms provided with legal personality, it is argued that the latter and the liability are diluted within the actual perspective of the doctrine, which in fact prioritizes the protection of corporate creditors. Such approach in the Romanian law still acknowledges a limited applicability, generated by an insufficient normative framework, yet the theory of flagrant abuse could explain the regulation of extending the shareholder’s limited liability, to the extent to which this abuses of these limitations, while preserving the corporate personality.
Andenas, M. & Wooldridge, F. (2009). European Comparative Company Law, Cambridge University Press, pp. 153
Cabrelli, D. (2010). The Case Against Outsider Reverse’ Veil Piercing in Company Law, University of Edinburgh School of Law, Working Paper no. 2010/03, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1546976
Cahn, A. & Donald, D.C. (2010). Comparative Company Law. Text and Cases on the Laws Governing Corporations in Germany, the UK and the USA, Cambridge University Press, pp. 47
Canfield, G. F. (1917). “The Scope and Limits of the Corporate Entity Theory”, Columbia Law Review, 17, www.jstor.org
Hansmann, H., Kraakman, R. & Squire, R. (2005). The New Business Entities in Evolutionary Perspective, http://ssrn.com/abstract=667929 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.667929
Horvathova, A. & Stanescu, C.G. (2012). Piercing the Corporate Veil: US Lessons for Romania and Slovakia, http://ssrn.com/abstract=2066030 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2066030
Oprea, A. (2011). “Observa?ii privind regimul persoanelor juridice în dreptul interna?ional privat român din perspectiva reglement?rilor din noul cod civil”, Studia Universitatis Babe?-Bolyai, Iurisprudentia, no. 3/2011, http://studia.law.ubbcluj.ro/articole.php?an=2011
Piperea, Gh. (2012). Drept comercial. Intreprinderea, ed. C.H.Beck, Bucure?ti, pp. 383-384
Werlauff, E. (2003). EU Company Law, (2nd edition), DJOF Publishing Copenhagen, pp. 40
Wild, C. & Weinstein S. (2009). Smith and Keenan’s company law, 14th ed., Pearson Education Limited, pp. 33
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
