International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences

search-icon

The Effects of 36663 Layout and Gender Differences in Writing Narrative Essay among Junior 3 ESL Learners

Open access

Mahendran Maniam, Jagvinder Kaur Swaran Singh, Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh, Shereen Shamala Benjamin Jeyaraja

Pages 713-727 Received: 15 Nov, 2022 Revised: 17 Dec, 2022 Published Online: 19 Jan, 2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJARBSS/v13-i1/10268
This study was designed to investigate the effects of using the 36663-layout writing strategy among Junior 3 ESL learners’ narrative essay and to discover whether there was any significant difference between the male and female learners in writing the narrative essay using the 36663-layout strategy. A quasi-experimental research design was adopted. The sample of the study consisted of (N=60) ESL learners from two classes at two private schools in Klang, Malaysia. Data obtained from the pre-test and post-test scores were analyzed descriptively. The mean score and standard deviation of the narrative essays were also calculated. The comparisons between the control group and experimental group were confirmed using t-test. The scores obtained from the post-test between the male learners and female learners were also analyzed using univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA). The difference between the pre-test and post-test means was statistically significant. The results from the analysis of post-test data by gender using the independent samples t-test yielded a t-value of 0.371 that was not statistically significant (p = .713 > .05), indicating that there is not statistically significant difference in the post-test means between the male and female students. This study implicates teachers should be trained in terms of the pedagogic approach on how to apply this layout to teach narrative essays in their classrooms for better results. By doing this, students will be more confident and motivated to produce good essays.
Ahmad, N., Khan, F. N. & Munir, N. (2013). Factors affecting the learning of English at secondary school level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 2(2), 95–101.
Awan, A. G., & Azeem, M. S. (2017). Gender differences and its impact on students' performance: A socio linguistic analysis. Global Journal of Management, Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 352-372.
Bruner, J. (1963). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Byrne, D. (1991). Teaching writing skills-Longman handbooks of language teachers. Longman: London.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath.
Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 81-92
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research In education (8th ed.). New York: Mc Graw HIll.
Geiser, S., & Studley, W. R. (2002). UC and the SAT: Predictive validity and differential impact of the SAT I and SAT II at the University of California. Educational Assessment, 8(1), 1–26.
Ghabool, N., Mariadass, M. E., & Kashef, S. H. (2012). Investigating Malaysian ESL students' writing problems on conventions, punctuation, and language use at secondary school level. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(3), 130-143.
Green, J., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learner strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 261-297. doi:10.2307/3587625
Haider, G. (2012). An insight into difficulties faced by Pakistani student writers: Implications for teaching of writing. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(3), 17–27.
Halpern, D. F. (2000). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Harmer, J. (2008). How to teach english. ELT Journal, 62(3), 313–316.
Held, S. (2010). Dumping graphic organizers for a more effective approach to prewriting instruction. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 38, 20-28
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in Second Language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101
Javed, M., Juan, W. X., & Nazli, S. (2013). A study of students’ assessment in writing skills of the english language. Online Submission, 6(2), 129–144.
Kirby, J.R., Moore, P.J. & Schofield, N J. (1988). Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemp Educ Psychol 13, 169–184.
Krashen, S. (2014). The power of reading. Libraries Unlimited
Linse, C., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Mahboob, A. (2014). Epilogue: Understanding language variation: Implications for eil pedagogy. Springer, Switzerland.
Mansoor, S. (2005). Language planning in higher education: A case study of Pakistan. Oxford University Press Karachi.
Marlina, R., & Giri, R. (2014). The pedagogy of English as an international language: Perspectives from scholars, teachers, and students. Springer.
McCutchen, D. (1984). Writing as a linguistic problem. Educational Psychologist, 19(4), 226–238.
Mehat, S. Z., & Ismalil, L. (2020). Malaysian tertiary ESL Students' writing errors and their implications on english language teaching. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 235, 242.
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 37– 45. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011
Mukundan, J., Mahvelati, E. H., Din, M. A., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2013). Malaysian secondary school students’ ESL writing performance in an intensive English program. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22, 1677-1684.
Nickerson, R. S., Perkins, D. N., & Smith, E. E. (2014). The teaching of thinking. Routledge, United Kingdom.
Palpanadan, S., Ismail, F., & Salam, A. R. (2015). Role of model essays in developing students writing skills in Malaysian schools: A review of literature. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 1-11.
Pajares, F., & Valiente, G. (1999). Grade level and gender differences in the writing self-beliefs of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 390-405.
Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on students writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(3), 265-289.
Ramadi, E., Ramadi, S., & Nasr, K. (2016). Engineering graduates’ skill sets in the MENA region: A gap analysis of industry expectations and satisfaction. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41, 34-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1012707
Rahman, T. (2002). Language, ideology and power. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.
Rahmat, Y. N., & Coxhead, A. (2021). Investigating vocabulary coverage and load in an Indonesian EFL textbook series. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 804-814. doi:10.17509/ijal.v10i3.31768
Siddiqui, S. (2007). Rethinking education in Pakistan: Perceptions, practices, and possibilities. Paramount Publishing Enterprise, United States.
Shafie, L. A., Maesin A., Osman, N., Nayan, S., & Mansor, M. (2010). Understanding collaborative academic writing among beginner university writers in Malaysia. Studies in Literature and Language, 1(2), 58-69.
Swanto, S., & Din, W. A. (2014). Employing drilling technique in teaching English writing skills to a group of rural Malaysian students. Developing Country Studies, 4, 73-83.
Tan, E. K., & Miller, J. (2008). Writing in English in Malaysian high schools: The discourse of examinations. Routledge
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250 –270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. MA: Harvard University Press.
Wong, S. R. (2021). Malaysian ESL students’ attitude, perceptions and preferences of teacher written feedback in writing. Borneo Akademika, 5(1), 13-24.
Yunus, M. M., Zakaria, S., & Suliman, A. (2019). The potential use of social media on Malaysian primary students to improve writing. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7, 450-458. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2019.74.450.45