Our education system helps to build identities among teenagers. As is known to all, the Chinese education system is totally different from a western system. With the task of exploring which is the better teaching method, a documentary named The School That Turned Chinese was carried out. The documentary presents differences in many aspects, especially in classroom activities. In education research, teachers and students are in a relationship of power, as Benesch (1999) claimed that in class, even the class arrangements are signs of power. In the class, the language used by teachers and students may subvert, challenge, or distribute power. To examine that process, it’s important to do text analysis. To this end, this study adopts Critical Discourse Analysis that involves the uncovering of covert forms of power and domination that underlie discourse (Fairclough, 1989: 55). This makes it a process of uncovering issues of asymmetrical power relations…which are largely hidden in texts and require procedures of “unveiling or demystification” (Fairclough, 1989: 141), with ‘critical’ being concerned with making visible the interconnectedness between language, power and ideology (Fairclough, 1989: 5). To this end, CDA examines how people obtain and maintain power in society through language (Wodak, 2001). In the light of CDA, this paper utilized descriptive qualitative method to deal with samples----which are teachers’ and students’ utterance chosen from segments of the documentary. Verbal elements, participants and circumstances are instruments for analysing. Besides, context and discursive practice are also taken into consideration. To conclude, this research looks deeply into how power relationship is built and challenged by teachers and students through language.
Yan, F. (2007). Are the voices of students heard: A case study of the impact of parental and school expectations on the emotional well-being of students in China. In Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association New Researchers/Student Conference (Vol. 5, p. 8).
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power., London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2005). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Psychology Press.
Wodak, R. (2001). What CDA is about–a summary of its history, important concepts and development. V Wodak, R. Meyer, M.(ur.), Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications, London, Thousand Oaks in New Delhi.
French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. Classics of organization theory, 7, 311-320.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2009). Critical discourse analysis: History, agenda, theory and methodology. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 1-33.
Jager, S., & Maier, F. (2009). Theoretical and methodological aspects of Foucauldian critical discourse analysis and dispositive analysis. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2, 34-61.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), 62-86.
Wodak, R. (2015). Critical discourse analysis, discourse?historical approach. The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction, 1-14.
Reisigl, M. (2017). The discourse-historical approach. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 44-59). Routledge.
Maftoon, P., & Shakouri, N. (2012). The concept of power in teacher talk: A critical discourse analysis. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(8), 1208-1215.
Oppelt, C. (2020). Discourse Analysis of (Power) Struggles in the Classroom: Confessions of a School Teacher. Revista Gatilho, 18(01), 170-184.
