Cinema as an artwork form and a technology which has best existed for a hundred years. Primitive cinema gadgets appeared and were used inside the Nineties, nearly concurrently, within the USA, France, Germany, and Great Britain. inside two decades, cinema had unfold all over the world; It had advanced state-of-the-art technology and become properly on its manner to turning into a first-rate enterprise that provided the most famous shape of entertainment to city audiences round the arena and attracted the eye of marketers, artists, scientists and politicians. The film medium started out for use for education, propaganda and clinical research in addition to amusement. Initially a combination of elements which includes vaudeville, popular melodrama, and illustrated lecture, it fast won inventive distinction and is now beginning to fade, along with other kinds of mass media and amusement which have emerged alongside it to threaten its hegemony. In the new millennium, India, the US, China, Nigeria, and Japan have end up foremost filmmaking facilities round the world. Cutting-edge filmmaking strategies are based on absolute creativity and superior technological programs. The arrival of coloration, stereophonic sound and widescreen has made the technical understanding required of a director nowadays a lot broader and extra complex. Overseas cinema has endured to dominate filmmaking script in the twenty first century. The proposed study is an attempt to examine the representation of various entities of society in foreign cinema. The study will focus on how various societal entities were presented and misrepresented in cinema. This study will explore on how with changing times, society-based cinemas started gaining popularity.
Aleiss, A. (2005). Making the white man's Indian: Native Americans and Hollywood movies. Greenwood Publishing Group.
Brereton, P. (2005). Hollywood Utopia, Bristol: Intellect Books.
Cannon, K. (2018). Blockers. Universal Pictures.
Cervulle, M. (2008). Daniel Bernardi (ed.), The Persistence of Whiteness: Race and Contemporary Hollywood Cinema (London and New York: Routledge, 2008,£ 16.99). Pp. 390. isbn978 0 415 77413 0. Journal of American Studies, 42(3).
Courtney, S. (2005). Hollywood Fantasies of Miscegenation: Spectacular Narratives of Gender and Race, 1903-1967. Princeton University Press.
Davies, J., & Smith, C. R. (2013). Gender, ethnicity, and sexuality in contemporary American film. Routledge.
Dinello, D. (2006). Technophobia!, Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
DuVernay, A. (2018). A Wrinkle in Time. Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures.
Flicker, E. (2003). Between brains and breasts-women scientists in fiction film: on the marginalization and sexualization of scientific competence. Public Understanding of Science, 12: 307-18.
Fogel, S. (2018). The Spy Who Dumped Me. Lionsgate.
Hamilton, M. J., Johnson, C. D., & Block, E. S. (2003). Projecting Ethnicity and Race: An Annotated Bibliography of Studies on Imagery in American Film (No. 10). Greenwood Publishing Group.
Hankin, K. (2007). And introducing... The female director: Documentaries about women filmmakers as feminist activism. NWSA journal, 19(1), 59-88.
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press.
Ingram, D. (2000). Green Screen, Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
Jones, R. (2001). ‘Why can’t you scientists leave things alone?: science questioned in British films of the post-war period (1945-1970). Public Understanding of Science, 10: 1-18.
Kanner, M. (2006). Going on instinct: gendering primatology in film. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 33: 206-12.
King, G. (2000). Spectacular Narratives, London: I.B. Tauris.
Kirby, D. (2003). The threat of materialism in the age of genetics: DNA at the drive-in, in Rhodes, G. (ed) Horror at the Drive-In: Essays in Popular Americana, Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 241-58.
Kirby, D. (2010). The future is now: diegetic prototypes and the role of popular films in generating real-world technological development. Social Studies of Science, 40: 41- 70.
Kunsey, I. (2019). Representations of Women in Popular Film: A Study of Gender Inequality in 2018. Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 10(2), 27-38.
Lambourne, R., Shallis, M. and Shortland, M. (1990). Close Encounters?, New York: Adam Hilger.
Leder, M. (2018). On the Basis of Sex. Focus Features.
McCurdy, H. (1997). Space and the American Imagination, Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
Miller, R. M. (Ed.). (1980). The kaleidoscopic lens: How Hollywood views ethnic groups. Ozer.
Pernick, M. (1996). The Black Stork, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sakellari, M. (2015). Cinematic climate change, a promising perspective on climate change communication. Public Understanding of Science, 24(7), 827-841.
Scherr, R. (2008). (Not) Queering White Vision.'. Jump Cut, 50, 1-19.
Shohat, E., & Stam, R. (2014). Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the media. Routledge.
Telotte, J. (1995). Replications, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Terzian, S., and Grunzke, A. (2007). Scrambled eggheads: ambivalent representations of scientists in six Hollywood film comedies from 1961 to 1965. Public Understanding of Science, 16: 407-419.
Thurs, D. (2007). Tiny tech, transcendent tech: nanotechnology, science fiction, and the limits of modern science talk. Science Communication, 29: 65-95.
Tosi, V. (2005). Cinema before Cinema: The Origins of Scientific Cinematography, London: British Universities Film and Video Council.
Weingart, P. (2008). The ambivalence towards new knowledge: science in fiction film, in Weingart, P. and Huppauf, B. (eds) Science Images and Popular Images of the Sciences, New York, Routledge, 267-282.
Wiesenfeldt, G. (2010). Dystopian genesis: the scientist's role in society, according to Jack Arnold. Film & History, 40: 58-74.
Wood, A. (2002). Technoscience in Contemporary American Film, Vancouver, B.C.: University of British Columbia Press.
