Design and Development Research (DDR) is a systematic study of design, development, and assessment process for production of instructional and non-instructional tools. The purpose of this study is to discuss the Modified DDR approach to develop the Creativity Clay Module to teach Special Educational Needs (SEN) students with learning disabilities in primary schools. Studies indicate that SEN students with learning disabilities are weak when presenting creative skills in the classroom. Students are not sufficiently taught creativity skills in schools as teachers' creativity is low, and they possess suboptimal skills in adopting teaching strategies of a creative in nature. Therefore, there is a need to develop a specific teaching module to foster creativity skills among students. This study employs the Modified DDR approach. There are three phases in DDR namely; phase one: needs analysis; phase two: design and development; and phase three: evaluation. During phase one, a survey method will utilize using purposive sampling by adopting questionnaire instruments for 110 teachers to ascertain the necessity of module development. Subsequently, the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) utilized to obtain 15 experts’ consensus to design and develop the module prototype. In phase three, the usability of module measured by conducting a survey study using a questionnaire instrument with 120 samples of special education teachers. Then, organize the findings systematically under the DDR phases and analyze the data using descriptive analysis in phases one and three. In what follows, the researcher derives the threshold, d value, and experts’ consensus value in designing, developing, and evaluating constructs and items of the phase two module. The conclusion of this article presents a conceptual framework for this research. Hence, the findings provide potential information and guidance to design and develop the Creativity Clay Module to teach SEN students with learning disabilities.
Adibah, L. A., Hafizah, Z. (2021). The creativity practice of islamic education teachers in 21st century learning. ASEAN Comparative Education Research Journal on Islam and Civilization. 4(1), 40-54. https://spaj.ukm.my/acerj/index.php/acer-j/article/view/67
Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its contribution to decision making. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Adom, D., Kamel, E. H., & Agyem, J. A. (2018). Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. International Journal of Scientific Research. 7(1), 86-91. Retrieved from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Theoretical-and-Conceptual-Framework%3A-Mandatory-of-Adom
Agnoli, S., Runco, M. A., Kirsch, C., & Corazza, G. E. (2018). The role of motivation in the prediction of creative achievement inside and outside of school environment. Journal of Thinking Skills & Creativity, 28, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.05.005
Alias, N., Siraj, S., Rahman, M. N. A., & DeWitt, D. (2013). Design and Developmental Research: Emergent Trends in Educational Research: Emergent Trends in Educational Research (pp.2-15), Malaysia: Pearson.
Anizam, M. Y., Manisah, M., Ali., Norhayati, M. N. (2020). Instilment of employability skills for special needs students, Online Journal for TVET Practitioners, 5 (1), 36-42. https://doi.org/0.30880/ojtp.2020.05.01.006
Berliner, D. C. (2004). Expert teachers: Their characteristics, development and accomplishments. In R. Batllori i Obiols, A. E Gomez Martinez, M. Oller i Freixa & J. Pages i. Blanch (eds.), De la teoria a l’aula: Formacio del professorat ensenyament de las ciències socials (pp. 13-28). Barcelona, Spain: Departament de Didàctica de la Llengua de la Literatura I de les Ciències Socials, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Bulut, D., Samur, Y., & Comert, Z. (2022). The effect of educational game design process on students’ creativity. Smart Learning Environments, 9(8), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00188-9
Burns, F. M. (1998). Essential components of schizophrenia care: A Delphi approach. Journal of Acta Psychiatry Scand, 98(5), 400-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10105.x
Chang, P. L., Hsu, C. W., & Chang, P. C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method of evaluating hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36, 14172-14179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045
Chen, Y., Yu, C., Yuan, Y., Lu, F., & Shen, W. (2021). The influence of trust on creativity: A review. Front. Psychology. 12:706234. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.706234
Cheng, C.H. & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 74-86.
Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 2826-2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034
Dalkey, N. C. (1972). The Delphi method: An experimental study of group opinion. Lexington Books.
Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. Scott, Foresman, and Co.
Egan, A., Maguire, R., Christopers, L., & Rooney, B. (2017). Developing creativity in higher education for 21st century learners: A protocol for a scoping review. International Journal of Education Research, 82, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015. https://doi.org/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1- 01567.x10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01567.x
Fariha, H. S., Rosnah, I., Hanizah, M. Y., Norziela, A., Ridhuan, M. J., & Faiz, D. (2019). Validation of occupational zoonotic disease ouestionnaire using fuzzy delphi method. Journal of Agromedicine, 25(2), 166-172. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2019.1666763
Faroh, I. N., Suhardi., & Mustadi, A. (2020). Improving elementary school students’ creativity and writing skills through digital comics. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 19 (2), 426-435. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689661
McKillip. (1987). Needs analysis: Tools for the human services and education. Sage.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysian Education Blueprint (MEB), (2013-2025). MOE Portal. https://www.moe.gov.my/en/dasarmenu/pelan-pembangunan-pendidikan-2013-2025
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2022). Special Education Division, Special Education Data dated 31 Oktober 2021. MOE Portal. Retrieved from: https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/pendidikankhas/buku-data-pendidikan-khas
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017). 21st century education implementation handbook. Curriculum Development Division.
Muqsith, A. A. (2018). Development of ENi model based on inquiry activities for the engineering skills training program of the Malaysian Skills Training Institute (Doctoral Association), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from: http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/8981/
Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (2017). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Journal of The Review of Higher Education. 18(4), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
Nazri, A. R. (2014). Development of a Homeschooling model based on community values and practices for Orang Asli children (Doctoral Dissemination, University of Malaya, KualaLumpur.Retrievedfrom:http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/4716/1/Mohd_Nazri_Bin_Abdul_Rahman_(PHA_110025).pdf
Yaakob, N. M. (2016). Development of technology m-learning curriculum model in teaching and learning in IPG (Doctoral Dissemination). Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok.
Norfarahi, Z., Isa, M. H., & Khadijah, A. R. (2020). Faktor pendorong kreativiti dalam kalangan pelajar politeknik. Asian People Journal. 3(2), 77-85. https://doi.org/10.37231/apj.2020.3.2.210
Nurulrabihah, M. N. (2020). Development of a teaching model of primary school design thinking (Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Nuzul, M. K. (2019). Design and development of e-Tvet teaching model for mechanical and manufacturing programs in northern zone vocational colleges (Doctoral Dissertation). Sultan Idris Education University, Perak.
Ocampo, L., Ebisa, J. A., Ombe, J., & Escoto, G. M. (2018). Sustainable ecotourism indicators with fuzzy Delphi method – A Philippine perspective. Ecological Indicators, 93, 874-888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.060
Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. The future we want: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development. (2019). PISA 2021 creative thinking framework (3rd draft). OECD Portal. https://www.oecd.org/ pisa/publications/PISA-2021-creative-thinking-framework.pdf
Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and Development Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbau Associates, Publishers.
Ridhuan, M. J., & Nurulrabihah, M. N. (2020). Methodological diversity in design and development research. Qaisar Prestige Resources Publisher.
Ridhuan, M. J., Saedah, S., Zaharah, H., Nurulrabihah, M. N., & Sapar, A. (2017). Basic introduction of delphi fuzzy method in design and development research. Minda Intelek Agency.
Ridhuan, M. J. (2016). SkiVes training curriculum model for the work -based learning (WBL) engineering study program of Politeknik Malaysia (Doctoral Dissertation), Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur). Retrieved from: http://studentsrepo.um.edu.my/6796/
Saedah, S., Tony, R. L. A., Rozaini, M. R. (2020). Design and development research approaches: Applications to educational research. Sultan Idris Education University Publisher.
Salbiah, M. H., & Roslinda, R. (2017). Tahap kreativiti pelajar tingkatan empat aliran sains di daerah Kuala Langat. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 4(1), 926-934. https://www.academia.edu/2537995/Tahap_kreativiti_di_kalangan_pelajar_program_sains_di_Fakulti_Pendidikan_Universiti_Teknologi_Malaysia
Shen, S., Wang, S., Qi, Y., Wang, Y., & Yan, X. (2021). Teacher Suggestion Feedback Facilitates Creativity of Students in STEAM Education. Front. Psychol. 12:723171. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723171
Shubashini, G., Sarrazin, I. M., Jawahar, N. L., Abdul Hakim, M., & Gunavathy, K. (2015). The identification of design formaintainability imperatives to achieve cost effective building maintenance: A Delphi study. Journal of Technology, 77(30), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6871
Sugita, M. I., Hartono & Sutikno. (2021). Implementation of creative physics experiment on the creativity of students’ ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1918 (2021) 022007 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1918/2/022007
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, Article 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
Swanson, R. A., & Holton, E. F. (2009). Foundations of human resource development (Vol. 2nd ed). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. UNESCO Portal. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002329/232993e.pdf
United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund. (2015). Life skills and citizenship education initiative middle east and north Africa. UNICEF Portal. https://www.unicef.org/mena/life-skills-and-citizenship-education
Vincent-Lancrin, S., Gonzales-Sancho, C., Bouckaertm, M., DeLuca, F., Fernandez-Barrerra, Jcotin, G., Urgel, J., & Vidal, Q. (2019). Fostering students’ creativity and critical thinking: What it means in school. Educational and Innovation. OECD Publishing.
Kai, Z. (2018). What cognitive neuroscience tells us about creativity education: A literature review. Global Education Review, 5 (1), 20-34. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1177633.pdf
