This paper takes institutional theory perspective to discuss the efforts being undertaken by regulators and accounting profession in Indonesia to strengthen its audit quality (AQ). The question being asked is whether Indonesia’s participation in ASEAN Audit Regulators Group (AARG), whose aim is to strengthen AQ in ASEAN country, is purely part of the country’s on-going efforts on AQ or is it motivated by mimetic pressure to be similar to its neighbours. Using data obtained from various public sources, the paper shows that in comparison with its neighbouring countries Indonesia is behind in terms of few aspects concerning AQ including the number of accountants in the country. However, evidence also shows that the country was putting in various initiatives in relation to its AQ even prior to its joining the AARG in 2014. Although the number of accountants was small relative to its population, the country is in fact seeing significant increase in the number in the last three years prior to its joining the AARG. Indonesia’s participation in AARG suggests that the country aims to be at par with its neighbours in terms of AQ. Following its participation with AARG, the country has issued a draft of Audit Quality Indicators (AQIs) in 2016 as well as Code of Ethics in 2017 for accountants. Hence, although participation in AARG could initially be motivated by mimetic pressure, the evidence shows that the country is in positive direction in its quest to improve AQ.
1. Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of economic literature, 48(1), 58-107
2. Aghaei Chadegani, A. (2011). Review of studies on audit quality. 312-317.
3. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2010). Comparative and international corporate governance. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 485-556
4. Asian Development Bank (2003), Diagnostic Study of Accounting and Auditing Practices in Indonesia, The Asian Development Bank, Manila
5. Barley, S. R., & Tolbert, P. S. (1991). Introduction: At the intersection of organizations and occupations
6. Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., & Hines, T. (2010). Factors affecting audit quality in the 2007 UK regulatory environment: perceptions of chief financial officers, audit committee chairs and audit engagement partners”.
7. Carruthers, B. G. (1995). Accounting, ambiguity, and the new institutionalism. Accounting, organizations and society, 20(4), 313-328
8. Centre for Audit Quality (CAQ). (2014). Approach to Audit Quality Indicator. Retrieved online from https://www.thecaq.org/caq-approach-audit-quality-indicators.
9. Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging markets review, 15, 1-33
10. Covaleski, M. A., Dirsmith, M. W., & Michelman, J. E. (1993). An institutional theory perspective on the DRG framework, case-mix accounting systems and health-care organizations.
11. Covaleski, M. A., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1988). An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation, and fall of a university budget category. Administrative science quarterly, 562-587.
12. DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of accounting and economics, 3(3), 183-199
13. DeFond, M. L., & Lennox, C. S. (2011). “The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality”. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52(1), 21-40.
14. Fearnley, S., Brandt, R., & Hines, T. (2014). “The impact of changing regulation on the behavior and perception of UK Directors and auditor”. Retrieved online from http://impact.ref.ac.uk/CaseStudies/ CaseStudy.aspx?Id=10898.
15. Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 1993-2023
16. Halpin, D. and Troyna, B. (1995). ‘The politics of policy borrowing’, Comparative Education 31(3).
17. Hecimovic, A., Martinov?Bennie, N., & Roebuck, P. (2009). “The force of law: Australian Auditing Standards and their impact on the auditing profession”. Australian accounting review, 19(1), 1-10.
18. Humphrey, C., Loft, A., Woods, M. (2009). The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: Understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis. Accounting Organizations and Society 34, 810-825.
19. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI) (2016). Laporan Tahunan 2016. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.
20. International Auditing and Assurance Standard Board (IAASB). (2014). A framework for Audit Quality. Retrieved online from http://www.ifac.org.
21. International Forum of independent Audit Regulator (IFIAR). (2016). IFIAR 2015 Annual Report. Retrieved online from https://www.ifiar.org/latest-news/ifiar-2015-annual-report/.
22. Jackson, A. B., Moldrich, M., & Roebuck, P. (2008). Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(5), 420-437.
23. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of business ethics, 103(3), 351-383.
24. Knechel, W. R. (2016). Audit quality and regulation. International Journal of Auditing, 20(3), 215-223.
25. Lennox, C. (2009). “The changing regulatory landscape”. International journal of Auditing, 13(2), 79-85.
26. Lennox, C. S., Wu, X., & Zhang, T. (2014). Does mandatory rotation of audit partners improve audit quality?.
To cite this article: Tyasari, I., Yusof, N.Z.M, Ku Bahador, K.M. (2018). Indonesia’s Participation in ASEAN Audit Regulators Group (AARG): Efficiency-driven or Institutional Pressure? International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8 (3): 299-309.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
