This study researched the predictive relationships among the elements of fraud diamond theory and how accountants rank these relationships for early detection of fraud. A ranking Likert scale questionnaire on the four elements of Pressure/incentive, opportunity, rationalization, and capability were randomly distributed and answered by 100 accountants who are members of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, Ghana. Based on Spearmen's rank order correlation, positive linear relationships were found to exist among all the four elements of the fraud diamond theory. Regarding predictive ranking of fraud occurrences from the perspective of accountants, the study noted that in order from large to small these probabilities are: Capability/Opportunity 0.611, Capability/Rationalization 0.574, Pressure/Rationalization 0.518, Opportunity/Rationalization 0.463, Capability/Pressure 0.266 and Pressure/Opportunity 0.212. Capability/Opportunity, Capability/Rationalization, and Pressure/Rationalization give a large prediction of fraud happening; Opportunity/Rationalization gives a medium prediction and Capability/Pressure, and Pressure/Opportunity provide a small prediction. The study, therefore, concluded that when the opportunity is minimized, potential fraudsters’ capability can be rendered redundant through supervision and when rationalization is made difficult, potential fraudsters delay or avoid their act of fraud. Policy-makers should, therefore, consider policies that reduce the opportunity to commit fraud and rationalization should be given much attention. Effective supervision must be intensified to control capability.
1. Abdullahi, R., Mansor, N., & Nuhu, M. S. (2015). Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory. Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Science, 5(4), 38-45. Doi: org/10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-13/1823
2. Asare, S. K., Wright, A., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2017). Challenges facing auditors in detecting financial statement fraud: insight from fraud investigations. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 7(2), 63-112.
3. Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money. Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith, 1-300.
5. Dorminey, J. W., Fleming, A. S., Kranacher, M., & Riley, R. A. (2010). Beyond the fraud triangle: Enhancing deterrence of economic crimes. The CPA Journal, 80(7), 17–24.
6. Enofe, A. O., Egbe, M.E., & America, D. O. (2016). Internal control mechanism and fraud prevention in Nigeria public sector: An application of the new fraud diamond theory. Journal of Accounting and Financial Management, 2(1), 35-47.
7. Gbegi, D. O. & Adebisi, J.F (2013). The new fraud diamond model- how can it help forensic accountants in fraud investigation in Nigeria? European Journal Accounting Auditing and Finance Research, 1(4), 129-138.
8. Gilbert (1997). Law dictionary. Harcourt Brace Legal and Professional Publications.
9. Hamberg, E. (2013), Supervision as control system: the design of supervision as a regulatory instrument in the social services sector in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, 17(3), 45-64.
10. Hauke J. & Kossowski T. (2011).Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficient on the same sets of data. Quaestiones Geographicae, 30(2), 87-93.
11. Holtfreter, K. (2004). Fraud in organization: An examination of control mechanism. Journal of Financial Crime, 12(1), 88-95.
12. Hood, Christopher; Oliver, James; Scott, Colin; Travers, Tony (1999) Regulation inside government: waste-watchers, quality police, and sleaze-busterz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Huber, D. (2017). Forensic accounting, fraud theory and the end of fraud triangle. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 12(2), 28-48.
14. Kennedy, K. A. (2012). An analysis of fraud: causes, prevention, and notable cases. Honors these and capstones 100. Retrieved from: http://Scholars.unh.edu/honors/100
15. Kung, J. E.B., Apolinar, J.M., Ramirez, J. I. & Rebadomia, W. (2015). Developing a fraud prediction model: Application of artificial intelligence methods using firm specific data and locational factors. Asia Pacific Business & Economics Perspectives, 3(2), 97-114.
16. Mackevicius, J. & Giriunas, L. (2013). Transformational research of the fraud triangle. Ekonomika, 92(4), 151-163.
17. Mohamed, Y. K., Ahmad, K. A. H., & Jon, S. (2015). Fraudulent financial reporting: An application of fraud models to Malaysian public listed companies. Macrotheme Review, 4(3), 126 -146.
18. Nijenhuis, R. (2016). Preventive of Dutch fraud cases. A multiple case study on the effectiveness of internal control in the process of financial statement fraud prevention. Retrieved from: http://essay.utwente.nl/69819/1/Nijenhuis_MA_BMS.pdf.
19. Ocansey, E. O. N. D. (2017). Forensic accounting and the combating of economic and financial crimes in Ghana. European Scientific Journal, 13(31), 379-393. Available at http://dx.doi. org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n31p379.
20. Ocansey, E. O. N. D., & Ganu, J. (2017). The role of corporate culture in managing occupational fraud. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(24), 102-107.
21. Ocansey, E. O. N. D., Adegbie, F. F., & Dada, S. O. (2015). Impact of economic and financial crimes on the economy of Ghana. VVU Journal of Business Research, 1(1), 106-121.
22. Omar, N. B., & Mohamad Din, H. F. (2010). Fraud diamond risk indicator: An assessment of its importance and usage. In CSSR 2010 -
To cite this article: Peprah, W.K. (2018). Predictive Relationships among the Elements of the Fraud Diamond Theory: The Perspective of Accountants, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8 (3): 141-148.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
