The study ascertained the effect of board heterogeneity on performance of firms in Nigeria. Specifically, the study examined the effect of board size, women on board and board independence on return on assets of listed manufacturing firms on Nigerian Stock Exchange. The study adopted Ex-post facto research design. Population of the study is made up of seventy six manufacturing firms listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange as at the year, 2016 while thirty two firms was used as sample of the study. The secondary data used in the study were sourced from the publications of Nigeria Stock Exchange and annual reports of the sampled firms. Multiple regression analysis with the aid of E-View 9.0 statistical software was used for data analysis. Findings of the study revealed that board size, women on board and board independence have significant and positive effect on return on assets of manufacturing firms listed on Nigerian Stock Exchange. Based on this, the study recommended among others that Firms should endeavor to diversify their board for improved groupthink and board effectiveness.
1. Abdulazeez DA, Ndibe L., & Mercy AM. (2016). Corporate governance and financial performance of listed deposit money banks in Nigeria. J Account Mark 5, 153-159. doi:10.4172/2168-9601.1000153.
2. Abdullah, S. N., Mohamad, N. R., & Mokhtar, M. Z. (2011). Board independence, ownership and CSR of Malaysian large firms. Corporate Ownership and Control, 8(3), 417–431.
3. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007.
4. Adjaoud, F., Zeghal, D., & Andaleeb, S. (2007). The effect of board’s quality on performance: A study of Canadian firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 623-635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00592.x
5. Aguilera R.V., Filatotchev, L., Gospel, H. & Jackson, G. (2007). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs contingencies and complimentaries. Organization Science, 19:475-492.
6. Akhtaruddin, M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M., & Yao, L. (2009). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. Jamar, 7(1),1–20.
7. Al-Moataz, E., & Hussainey, K. (2012). Determinants of corporate governance disclosure in Saudi companies. Journal of Economics and Management, 5(1), 52–84.
8. Al-Shammari, B., & Al-Sultan, W. (2010). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in Kuwait. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(3), 262–280.
9. Bear, S., Rahman, N. & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207–221. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.
10. Brajesh, K. (2010). Competing human interest: The key domain for effective corporate governance. Advances in Management, 3(11), 210-225.
11. Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value. The Financial Review, 38(1), 33–53. http://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6288.00034.
12. Clarke, T. (2007). Theories of Corporate Governance: The Philosophical Foundations of Corporate Governance. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London, New York.
13. Dar, L.A., Naseem, M.A., Rehman, R.U. & Niazi, G.S. (2011). Corporate governance and firm performance: A case study of Pakistan oil and gas companies listed in Karachi stock exchange. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(8), 1-9. Retrieved from: www.journalofbusiness.org/ index…/469.
14. Dombin, A.N. (2013). Role of corporate governance in attracting investments in Nigeria. Journal of Educational & Social Research,3(9), 35-42.
15. Donaldson, L., & Muth, M.M. (1998). Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance- An International Review, 6(1), 5-28.
16. Donaldson, W.H. (2003). Corporate governance. Business Economics, 38, 16-20.
17. Dutta, P. & Bose, S. (2006), Gender diversity in the boardroom and financial performance of commercial banks: Evidence from Bangladesh. The Cost and Management, 34(6), 70-74.
18. Esa, E., & Mohd-Ghazali, N. A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Malaysian government-linked companies. International Journal of Business in Society, 12(3), 292–305. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0270.2009.01940.x.
19. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2012). Does board gender composition affect corporate social responsibility reporting? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(1), 31–38.
20. Fernando, A.C. (2006). Corporate governance: Principles, policies and practices. New Delhi: Dorling Kindersley.
21. Filatotchev, I. & Boyd Bk. (2009). Taking stock of corporate governance research while looking to the future. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 257- 265.
22. Fodio, M. I., & Oba, V. C. (2012). Boards’ gender mix and extent of environment
To cite this article: Onyali, C.I., Okerekeoti, C.U. (2018). Board Heterogenity and Corporate Performance of Firms in Nigeria, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 8 (3): 103-117.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
