The present study focuses on the study of suspense in the context of exploring the experiences of preschool children in their interaction with a form of digital story, connecting suspense with the enjoyment of learning. The study seeks to contribute to the expansion of research into the user experience in the fields of new (interactive) media, as the conception and empirical evaluation of the way in which listeners, and in particular young children, respond to a (interactive) digital story is not developed. The sample consisted of 32 children of kindergarten and pre-kindergarten age, who, after being divided into two groups, were exposed to listening to a different form of the same digital aloud reading: interactive and non-interactive. The measurement of suspense was based on the verbal (use of language, making noise) and non-verbal (facial expressions, physical movement, gestures, touching) reactions of toddlers, which are manifestations of their involvement in the outcome of the story. Verbal and non-verbal behaviors were videotaped during digital reading aloud. The data were coded for each child at one-minute intervals, examining the simultaneous behavior and then collected, to determine the frequency measurements of the individual toddler behaviors by type in each form of digital narrative. The results show that a) digital storytelling in both listening conditions caused intense suspense in preschool children as it is a narrative adventure that has the structure of a story of agony,b)there are no significant differences between the two listening conditions, c) linearity of the narrative, the role of the user and the degree of his interaction with the digital story are reduced to important factors that increase suspense and enjoyment. Further research could be related to the investigation of toddlers' reactions when the interaction is presented as a challenge or a game, when it is reduced to (re) -creation and when it enhances the experience of the story by the user taking on a role in the plot of the narrative.
Aliagas, C., & Margallo, A. M. (2017). Children’s responses to the interactivity of storybook apps in family shared reading events involving the iPad. Literacy, 51 (1), 44-52.
Alwitt, L. F. (2002). Suspense and advertising responses. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 35–49.
Aylett, R., Louchart, S., Tychsen, A., Hitchens, M., Figueiredo, R., Delgado Mata, C. (2008). Towards a narrative theory of virtual reality. Virtual Reality Journal, 7, 2-9.
Barbas, H. &Correia, N. (2009). The making of an interactive digital narrative– Instory. In Schreurs, J. (Ed.), Proceedings Euromedia’2009, Eurosis Publication, 35-41.
Barnet, Sylvan, Morton Berman, and William Burto (1971), A Dictionary of Literary,
Dramatic, and Cinematic Terms. Boston: Little, Brown.
Ben-David, S., Eiron, N., & Long, P. (2003). On the difficulty of approximately maximizing agreements. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 66, 496–514.
Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New-York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Blumler, J.& Katz, E. (1974). The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Brewer, W. F. & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1981). Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars. In Long, J. and Baddely, A., editors, Attention and performance IX, pages 363–379.Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Brewer, W. F. & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473–486.
Caplin, A., & Leahy, J. (2001), Psychological Expected Utility Theory and Anticipatory Feelings, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (1), 55-79.
Carroll, N. (1996). The Paradox of Suspense, in Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations, P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, and M. Friedrichsen, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chen, M., Ferdig, R., & Wood, A. (2003). Understanding technology-enhanced storybooks and their roles in teaching and learning: an investigation of electronic storybooks in education. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 3(1).
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S.T. (2012). Stereotypes and schadenfreude: affective and physiological markers of pleasure at outgroup misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 63–71.
Coiro, J. (2003). Reading comprehension on the internet: Expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458-464.
De Jong, M. T. & Bus A.G. (2003). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 3, 147–164.
Demos, E.V. (1982). Facial expressions of infants and toddlers: a descriptive analysis. In T. Field & A. Fogel (Eds.), Emotion and early interaction (pp. 127–160). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (2003a). Every child matters. London: DfES.
de Wied, M., Tan,S. H., &Frijda,N. (1992), "Duration Experience Under Conditions of Suspense in Film," in Time, Action and Cognition: Towards Bridging the Gap, Francoise Macar, Viviane Pouthas, and William J. Friedman, eds. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dimoulas, C., Veglis, A., & Kalliris, G. (2015). Audiovisual hypermedia in the
semantic Web. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (3rd ed.; p.p. 7594-7604).
Ekman, P. (2003). Sixteen enjoyable emotions.Emotion Researcher, 18, 6–7.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (2003). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Cambridge, MA: Malor Books.
Goetz, T., Nathan C., Hall, B., Anne, C., Frenzel, A., & Pekrun, R. (2006). A hierarchical conceptualization of enjoyment in students.Learning and Instruction, 16, 323-338.
Griffin, S. (2005). Teaching for enjoyment: David Manson and his ‘play school’ of Belfast. Irish Educational Studies, 24(2), 133-143.
Hartley, D. (2006). Excellence and enjoyment: The logic of a ‘contradiction’. British Journal of Educational Studies54(1), 3-14.
Hartmann, T., Stuke, D., &Daschmann, G. (2008). Positive Parasocial Relationships with Drivers Affect Suspense in Racing Sport Spectators. Journal of Media Psychology:Theories, Methods, and Applications, 20(1):24–34.
Hiatt, S. W., Campos, J. J., & Emde, R. N. (1979). Facial patterning and infant emotional expression: happiness, surprise, and fear. Child Development, 50, 1020–1035.
Izard, C. E., Huebner, R. R., Risser, D., & Dougherty, L. (1980). The young infant’s ability to produce discrete emotion expressions.Developmental Psychology, 16 (2), 132–140.
Javorsky, K., & Trainin, G. (2014). Teaching young readers to navigate a digital story when rules keep changing.The Reading Teacher.
Jose, P. (1988), Liking of Plan-Based Stories: The Role of Goal Importance and Goal Attainment Difficulty, Discourse Processes, 11, 261-73.
Jose, P., & Brewer W. (1990), Early Grade School Children's Liking of Script and Suspense Story Structures, Journal of Reading Behavior, 22 (4), 355- 72.
Kassler, M. (1996), "Factors of Suspense in Narratives and Film," Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Memphis.
Klimmt, C., Rizzo, A., Vorderer, P., Koch, J., and Fischer, T. (2009b). Experimental Evidence for Suspense as Determinant of Video Game Enjoyment.Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 12(1):29–31.
Knobloch, S., Patzig, G., Mende, A.-M., &Hastall, M. (2004). Affective News: Effects of Discourse Structure in Narratives on Suspense, Curiosity, and Enjoyment While Reading News and Novels. Communication Research, 31(3):259–287.
Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2004). Do Hebrew electronic books differ from Dutch electronic books? A replication of a Dutch content analysis.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 1–12.
Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge
McQuail, D. (1987). Mass Communication Theory: an Introduction. Sage, New York.
Mikos, L. (1996), The Experience of Suspense: Between Fear and Pleasure, in Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations, Peter Vorderer, Hans J. Wulff, and Mike Friedrichsen, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moll, H., Kane, S., & McGowan, L. (2015). Three-year-olds express suspense when an agent approaches a scene with a false belief. Developmental Science (2015), 1–13.
Nikolajeva, M. (1996).Introduction to the theory of children's literature.Talinn Pedagogical University.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988), The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paiva, A., Dias, J., Sobral, D., Aylett, R., Sobreperez, P., Woods, S., Zoll, C., & Hall, L. (2004). Caring for agents and agents that care: Building empathic relations with synthetic agents. Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference onAutonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004.
Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999), The Experience Economy: Work Is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ryan, M. (2006). Avatars of Story Minneapolis / London.University of Minnesota Press.
Schmar-Dobler, E. (2003). Reading on the internet: The link between literacy and technology. Journal of Adolescent & Literacy, 47(1), 80-85.
Shernoff, D. J., Csikszentmihalyi, M., Schneider, B., & Shernoff, E.S. (2003).Student engagement in high school classroomsfrom the perspective of flow theory.School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 158-176.
Sipe, L. (2007). Storytime. New York: Teachers College Press.
Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002).Weaving the literacy web: Changes in reading from page to screen. Reading Teacher, 55(7), 662-669.
Sternberg, M. (1978), Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Szilas, N. (2003). IDtension: a narrative engine for Interactive Drama. In Gobel et al (Eds), Proceedings TIDSE 2003, FrauenhoferIRBVerlag.
Vorderer, P., Wulff, H. J., & Friedrichsen, M. (1996), Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vorderer, P., &Knobloch, S. (2000), Conflict and Suspense in Drama, in Media Entertainment: The Psychology of Its Appeal, D. Zillmann and P. Vorderer, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vorderer, P., Knobloch, S., & Schramm, H. (2001), Does Entertainment Suffer From Interactivity? The Impact of Watching an Interactive TV Movie on Viewers' Experience of Entertainment, Media Psychology, 3, 343-63.
Vorderer, P., Klimmt, C., &Ritterfeld, U. (2004a). Enjoyment: At the heart of media entertainment. Communication Theory, 14(4):388–408.
Vorderer, P., Steen, F. F., & Chan, E. (2006). Motivation.Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Wuss, P. (1996), Narrative Tension in Antonioni, in Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations, P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, and M. Friedrichsen, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zillman, D. (1996). The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In Vorderer, P., Wulff, H. J., and Friedrichsen, M., editors, In conceptualizations, theoretical analyses,and empirical explorations, pages In conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and e. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Zillmann, D. (1971). Excitation transfer in communication - mediated aggressive behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(4), 419–434.
Zillman, D., & Vorderer, P. (2000). Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal. Erlbaum, Mahwah,NJ.
In-Text Citation: (Gkantia & Dinas, 2021)
To Cite this Article: Gkantia, E., & Dinas, K. D. (2021). Preschool Experiences of Children Interacting with Digital Stories: Focusing on Suspense as a Factor of Enjoyment. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 9(1), 197–210.
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
