Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences

search-icon

“Micropolitics” and Secondary Education Teachers’ Evaluation in Greece

Open access
The present research is based on the theoretical conceptual framework of Personal (the personal) Interpretation Framework, through which teachers relate their working experiences to desirable working conditions and their professional interests, define their working role and give meaning to educational policy measures. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of micropolitics, expressed by teachers through their beliefs and defense of their professional interests, regarding their views on the evaluation of educational work. The survey was conducted with 209 public secondary education teachers in the region of Magnesia in Greece. A self-report questionnaire composed of closed questions was used. The findings indicated that the development of micropolitical views on the evaluation of educational work is positively correlated with teachers’ age, their educational background and their experience in the same school, while it is negatively correlated with their postgraduate studies. Moreover, teacher’s micropolitical views on a particular category of professional interests are an indication of micropolitical behaviour, generally, towards the evaluation of educational work. The findings highlighted informal and unofficial - that’s why essential - aspects of school reality, concerning the issue of evaluation of educational work. Therefore, our findings may be useful in planning (the planning) of educational policy concerning acceptance by teachers, effective implementation and (, and) achievable effects of evaluation of educational work.
Altrichter, H., & Salzgeber, S. (2000). Some elements of a micropolitical theory of school development, in: H. Altrichter & J. Elliott (Eds) Images of educational change, 99-110. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press
Athanasiades, C. (2001). Educational unions and evaluation. In:?agakis, G. Evaluationofeducationalprogramsandschool, 146-153. Athens: Metaihmio (in Greek).
Bacharach, S. B., & Mundell B. L. (1993). Organizational politics in schools: micro; macro, and logics of action. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(4), 423-452
Ball, S. J. (1987). The micropolitics of the school: Towards a theory of school organization. London: Methuen
Blase, J. (1988a). The everyday political perspective of teachers: vulnerability and conservatism. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1, 125-142
Blase, J. (1991a). The politics of life in schools: Power, conflict and cooperation. London: Sage Publications
Blase, J. (2005). The micropolitics of educational change. In: A. Hargreaves (Eds) Extending Educational Change, 264-277. The Netherlands: Springer.
Blase, J., & Anderson, G. (1995). The Micropolitics of Educational Leadership. New York: Teachers College Press.
Blase, J., & Blasé, J. (2002). The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research.Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(1), 6-44.
Burns, T. (1961). Micropolitics: Mechanisms of institutional change. Administration Science Quarterly, 6, 257-281.
Conley, S., & Glasman, N. S. (2008). Fear, the School Organization, and Teacher Evaluation. Educational Policy, 22(1), 63-85.
Creswell, J. (2011). Research in education. Ahtens: Ellin (translated in Greek).
Cusick, R. A. (1992). The educational system: Its nature and logic. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Doukas, C. (2000). Educational policy and power. Athens: Grigoris (in Greek).
Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Fenstermacher, G. (1990). Some moral considerations on teaching as a profession. In J. Goodlad, R. Soder, & K. Sirotnik (Eds.), The Moral Dimensions of Teaching (pp. 130-151). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Fink, D. (2000). Good schools, real schools: Why school reform doesn’t last. New York: Teachers CollegePress.
Gillborn, D. (1994). The micro-politics of Macro Reform. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 15(2), 147-164.
Gitlin, A., & Margonis, R. (1995). The political aspect of reform: teacher resistance as good sense.American Journal of Education, 103, 377-405.
Hargreaves, A. (1995). Development and desire. A postmodern perspective. In T. R. Guskey, & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education new paradigms & perspectives (pp. 9-34). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1998). What’s worth fighting for in education?Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Helsby, G. (1999).Changing teachers’ work, Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Hoyle, E. (1982). Micropolitics of educational organizations, Educational Management and Administration, 10, 87-98.
Hoyle, E. (1986). The politics of school management. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Hoyle, E. (1999). The two faces of micropolitics, School Leadership & Management, 19(2), 213-222.
Iannaccone, L. (1975), Education policy systems. A study guide for educational administrators. Fort Lauderdale, FL: NovaUniversity.
Iannaccone, L. (1991). Micropolitics of education: what and why. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 465-471.
Kelchtermans, G. (1993a). Getting the story, understanding the lives. From career stories to teachers’ professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(5-6), 443-456.
Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Teacher vulnerability. Understanding its moral and political roots.Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 307-323.
Kelchtermans, G. (2005). Teachers’ emotions in educational reforms: self-understanding, vulnerable commitment and micropolitical literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 995-1006.
Kelchtermans, G. (2007c). Macropolitics caught up in micropolitics. The case of the policy on quality control in Flanders. Journal of Education Policy, 22, 471-491.
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002a). The micropolitics of teacher induction. A narrative-biographical study on teacher socialisation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 105-120.
Kelchtermans, G., & Ballet, K. (2002b). Micropolitical Literacy: Reconstructing a neglected dimension in teacher development. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 755-767.
Kelchtermans, G., & Vandenberghe, R. (1996). Becoming political: a dimension in teachers’ professional development. A micropolitical analysis of teachers’ professional biographies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York (ERIC-Document ED 395-921).
Kievit, F., & Vandenberghe, R. (1993). School culture, school improvement & teacher development. Leiden: DSWOPress-LeidenUniversity.
Koutouzis, M., & Hatziefstratiou, I. (1999). Evaluation in Educational Unit. In: Athanasoula-Reppa, A., Koutouzis, M., & Hatziefstratiou, I., Educational units Administration (Vol. 3): Social and European Dimension of Educational Administration. Patras: Open University of Greece (in Greek).
Lortie, D. C. (1975), Schoolteacher." A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Malen, B. (1994). The micropolitics of education: mapping the multiple dimensions of power relations in school politics. Journal of Educational Research, 9(5-6), 147-167.
Mangham, I. (1979). The politics of organizational change. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Marshall, C., & Scribner, J. D. (1991). It’s all political: inquiry into the micropolitics of education. Education and Urban Society, 23(4), 347-355.
Oser, F., Dick, A., & Patry, J. L. (Eds.) (1992). Effective and Responsible Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Papaconstantinou, P. (1993). Educational work and evaluation in school. Athens: Ekfrasi (in Greek).
Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Teacher’s workplace: The social organization of schools. New York: Longman.
Rusch, E. (2005). Institutional barriers to organizational learning in schools systems: The power of silence. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 83-120.
Schempp, P. G., Sparkes, A. C., & Templin, T. J. (1993). The micropolitics of teacher induction. American Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 447-472.
Schmidt, M., & Datnow, A. (2005). Teachers’ sense-making about comprehensive school reform: The influence of emotions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 949-965.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1997). How can we move toward a community theory of supervision? In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 264-280). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Smyth, J. (1997). Is supervision more than the surveillance of instruction? In J. Glanz & R. F. Neville (Eds.), Educational supervision: Perspectives, issues, and controversies (pp. 286-295). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Smyth, J., & Garman, M. (1989). Supervision as school reform: A “critical” perspective. Journal of Education Policy, 4, 343-361.
Taylor, J. (2005). The next generation of workers in Australia: Their views on organizations, working and rewards. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(10), 1919-1932.
Timperley, H. S., & Robinson, V. M. J. (1998). The Micropolitics of Accountability: The Case of Staff Appraisal. Educational Policy, 12(1), 162-176.
Townsend, R. G. (1990). Toward a broader micropolitics of schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 20(2), 205-225.
In-Text Citation: (Goutzioupas & Iordanides, 2013)
To Cite this Article: Goutzioupas, G., & Iordanides, G. (2013). “Micropolitics” and Secondary Education Teachers’ Evaluation in Greece. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 1(1), 70–85.