A sample of 321 middle class male and female adults having a family participated in a study that aimed to examine whether a social reality can be more accurately constructed by aggregating the self-perceptions of individuals or by pooling their perceptions of the people living around them. Respondents indeed construed their self-more positively, less negatively, and less expedient than of the people around them. However, strong correspondence between self and people perceptions suggested that the controversy about the efficacy of the two methods has been rather exaggerated and that social reality can be explored by either way provided the effects of social desirability from self-perception and stereo typicality from people’s perceptions are partial out and data were collected with greater rapport with the respondents.
Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Allport, G. W. (1968). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G Lindzey and E Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed.) 1, 1-80, Reading, MA: Addisson-Wesley.
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self- perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 6,1-62. New York: Academic Press.
Berkowitz, A. D. (2004). The Social Norms Approach: Theory, Research and Annotated Bibliography. New YorK; Perkins & Linkenbach.
Bernard, H. R., Killworth, P., Kronenfeld, D., & Sailer, L. (1984). The problem of informant accuracy: The validity of retrospective data. Annual Review of Anthropology, 495-517.
Bromley, D. (1978). Natural language and the development of the self. In C. B. Keasey (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1977: Social and Cognitive Development. University of Nebraska Press.
Campbell, D. T. (1955). The informant in quantitative research. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 339-342.
Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Scribner.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: John Wiley.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. New York: Dryden Press.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hogan, R. T. (1975). Theoretical egocentrism and the problem of compliance. American Psychologist, 30, 533-540.
Lewis, M., & Brook-Gunn, J. (1979). Social cognition and the acquisition of self. NY: Plenum.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pandey, M. (2012). The middle class mentality. Research report submitted in Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), New Delhi, India.
Sampson, E. E. (1977). Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 767-782.
Sinha, J. B. P. (2010). Living and doing psychology. Psychology and Developing Societies, 22(1), 95-120.
Sinha, J. B. P., Singh, S., Gupta, P., Srivastava, K. B. L., Sinha, R. B. N., Srivastava, S., Ghosh, A., Sidiqui, R., Tripathi, N., Gupta, M., Pandey, A., Mulla, Z., &Vijayalakshmi, C. (2010). An exploration of the Indian mindset. Psychological Studies, 55(1), 3-17.
Sinha, J. B. P., & Verma, J. (1987). Structure of collectivism. In C. Kagitcibasi (Ed.), Growth and progress in cross-cultural psychology. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Sinha, J. B. P., Vohra, N., Singhal, S., Sinha, R. B. N., & Ushashree, S. (2002). Normatiuve predictions of collectivist-individualist intentions and behaviour of Indians. International Journal of Psychology, 37(5), 309–319.
Sinha, R. B. N. (2012). Culture- sensitive method for exploring social reality. The Social Engineer, 13(1-2), 80-90.
Sinha, R. B. N., & Hassan, A. (2014). Respondents versus Informants Method of Data Collection: Implications for Business Research. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(1), 1-13.
Sinha, D., & Tripathi, R. C. (1994). Individualism in a collectivist culture: A case of coexistence of opposites. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and application (pp. 123–136). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Spence, J. (1985). Achievement American Style: The rewards and costs of individualism. American Psychologist, 40, 1285-1295.
Triandis, H. C. (1980). Introduction. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Triandis, H. C. (1995). Individualism and collectivism. Boulder, Co: West View Press.
In-Text Citation: (Pandey, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Pandey, M. (2019). Controversy of Self versus People Perception: Revisited . Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 7(1), 68–67.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
