This paper analyses political speeches as a factor in national integration in Kenya. Kenya is a country characterized by diverse cultures reflected in the forty-two tribes that comprise the Kenyan people. For meaningful development to be realized, it is theorized that the Kenyan people should harmoniously work as one. From a sociolinguistic perspective, language has an ideological function in fostering national integration as an ingredient for national development. Politicians in Kenya and the world over constitute the ruling class that is characterized by use of a linguistic genre described as political discourse. This paper argues that as an elite class within society, politicians in Kenya use political speeches to influence the perceptions of the rank and file while consolidating power and influence over the people. The political ideology that the speeches inculcate among the listeners is one that weakens the national integration fabric, and consequently national development. From a Critical Language Studies perspective, the paper applies Relevance Theory by Sperber and Wilson (1986 & 1995) and Wilson and Sperber (2004) in a pragmatic interpretation of speeches by politicians in Kenya to demonstrate that, as a communicative event, political speeches in Kenya largely advance a selfish political agenda than disseminate a national agenda on integration and thus, national development. The speeches used in this study were collected through a participant-observer mode. They were captured and recorded using a high sensitivity digital recorder at political rallies during the Bungoma County senatorial by-election in December, 2013.
Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structure of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: CUP.
Beard, A. (2000). The language of Politics. London: Routledge
Boden, D., & Zimmerman, D. H. (Eds.). (1991) Talk and Social Structure; Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Drake, C. (1989). National integration in Indonesia, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Etzioni, A. (1965). Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston, Inc.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2007). An introduction to language (8th ed.). U.S.A.: Thomson Wadsworth.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). “Communicative Functions of Language”. Retrieved from air.gtelp.co.kr/Board/air_pds/file/checlist2.pdf
Kaur, G. (2013). “Understanding National Integration and Challenges in Its way”. Retrieved from www.Confabjournals.com/Confabjournals/images/810201381117.pdf
Kihara, P. C., & Schroder, H. (2012). ‘A Relevance-Theoretical Analysis of Mchongoano’. The University of Nairobi. Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2, 63-78.
Oxford Advances Learner’s Dictionary. (5th ed). (2000). New York: Oxford University Press.
Manley, M. (2008). The Politics of change. Washington, D. C.: Howard University Press.
Martin & Nakayama. (2008). in West, R. & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and Application (4th ed). New York: Mc Grow Hill.
Mazrui, A. (1972). Cultural Engineering and Nation-building in East Africa. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Mohanty, T. K. (2006). National Integration and Communal Harmony. Orissa Review January, 2006. Retrieved from http://orissa.gov.in/e-
magazine/Orissareview/jan2006/engpdf/National Integration.pdf.
Osabuohien, P. A. (1998). Communication and development quintessentials: The focus of development agencies and theorists. The Journal of Development Communication, 9,1-16.
Ramney, A. (1996). Governing: An Introduction to Political Science. (7th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Rashid, N. A. (2013) Understanding National Integration for Development. Retrieved from http://www.gowerpub.com/pdf/SamplePages/CommunicatingNationalIntegrationCh1.pdf on Jan., 2014.
Roskin, M., Cord, R. L., Medeiros, J. A., & Jones, W. S. (1997). Political Science: An Introduction. (6th ed). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Retrieved from
http://www.Phon.ucl,ac.uk/home/PUB/WPL/02papers /wilson-sperber.pdf.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Basill. Blackwall.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Postface to the second edition of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell: Oxford.
Tehranian, M. (1994) ‘Communication and development,’ in Crowley, D. & Mitchell, D. (Eds.). (1994). Communication Theory Today. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1985). Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol 3. Discourse and Dialogue. London: Academic Press
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and Application (4th ed). New York: Mc Grow Hill.
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). “Relevance Theory”. In Horn, L. & Ward, G. (Eds.). The Handbook of Pragmatics. p.p. 633-657. Oxford: Blackwell.
Yus, F. (2010) “Relevance Theory.” In Heine, B. & Narrog, H. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. p.p. 679-701. Oxford: OUP.
In-Text Citation: (Wangatiah et al., 2016)
To Cite this Article: Wangatiah, I. R., Ongarora, D., & Matu, P. (2016). Political Speeches and National Integration: A Pragmatic Analysis of selected Political Speeches in Kenya. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(1), 57–70.
Copyright: © 2016 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
