Building a human community is a task beset with difficulties, since communities can have diverse levels of efficiency and this ultimately affects the personal satisfaction and development of its members but it also affects the stability, duration and (, and) even existence of the community. The desired building of a community requires personal commitment and collective participation of its members. The aim of my project that is based on the methodology of Grounded Theory is twofold: a) bring to the fore and shed light on the experiences and convictions concerning the activity of people in diverse communities, and b) to articulate a systematic and explanatory theory regarding the way a community is built with the aim to suggest that the manner of handling information is the main factor that unifies a community. As manner of handling information I understand the way in which every piece of information is created, elaborated, filled with content, evaluated and is used within a community. From this point of view the process of community building goes through three stages, that of understanding, that of endorsement and finally of applying the manner of handling information.
Conrad, D. (2002). ‘Deep in the hearts of learners: insights into the nature of online community’, Journal of Distance Education. Retrieved February 02, 2005 from:
http://cade.athabascau.ca/ vol17.1/conrad.html
Garber, D. (2004). ‘Growing virtual communities’, International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning’, Retrieved January 05, 2005 from
http://www.irrodl.org/content/v5.2/ technote4.html
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: advances in the methodology of grounded theory. California: The Sociological Press, Mill Valley.
Glaser, B. G. (1996). Origins of grounded theory. Edited transcript of proceedings of a grounded theory workshop conducted by Dr Barney Glaser in Christchurch, New Zealand
Glaser, B. G. (2005). Grounded Theory Perspective III: Theoretical coding, Sociology Press Mill Valley, CA.
Harasim, L. (1995). ‘Networlds: Networks as social space’, in L. Harasim (Ed.) Global networks: Computers and international communication (pp. 15-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hare, A. P., & Davies, M. F. (1994). ‘Social interaction’, in A.P. Hare, H.H. Blumberg, M.F. Davies & M.V. Kent (Eds.). Small group research: A handbook (pp. 169-193), Norwood, NJ, Ablex.
Jones, S. G. (Ed.) (1997) ‘Virtual culture: identity and communication in cyber society’, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
Kowch, E., & Schwier, R. (1997). ‘Characteristics of technology-based virtual learning communities’, Retrieved January 05, 2005 from
http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/communities/communities.htm
Lave, E., & Wenger, E. (1991). ‘Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice’, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Oren, A., Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., & Lahav, O. (2000). ‘Learnet-A model for virtual learning communities in the world wide web’, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6 (2), pp. 141-157
Preece, J. (2000). ‘Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability’, New York, J. Wiley & Sons
Riel, M. (1996). ‘The Internet: A land to settle rather than an ocean to surf and a new "place" for school reform through community development’, Available at
http://gsh.lightspan.com/gsh/teach/ articles/ netasplace.html
Rheingold, H. (1993). ‘The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier’, New York, Harper Collins
Scholer, D. (1996). ‘New community networks: Wired for change’, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley Publishing Schrage, M. (1990) ‘Shared Minds: The New Technologies of Collaboration’, New York, Random House
Stahl, G. (2000). ‘Collaborative information environments to support knowledge construction by communities’, AI & Society, 14, 1-27, Retrieved January 05, 2005 from http://www.cis.drexel.edu/ faculty/gerry/cscl/papers/ch04.htm
Wellman, B. (1997). ‘An electronic group is virtually a social network’, in S. Kiesler (Ed.) Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205), Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum
Wenger, E. (1998). ‘Communities of practice learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Wilson, B., & Ryder, M. (1996). ‘Dynamic learning communities: An alternative to designed instructional systems’, Educational Technology Research and Development, Available at http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/dlc.htm.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992) ‘Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media’, Academy of Management Review, 17 (2), pp. 299-326.
In-Text Citation: (Karageorgopoulos, 2014)
To Cite this Article: Karageorgopoulos, C. (2014). Information Handling Manner As Main Unifying Factor In Community Building. Multilingual Academic Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 2(2), 92–106.
Copyright: © 2014 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
