The purpose of this study was to measure the content validity by expert panel instruments shura elements among Islamic teachers in primary schools. This study was conducted to study the content validity of the shura instrument through two-step process namely development and judgment. In the first step, the domain determination and instrumentation. While the second step, the content validity ratio and content validation index were performed. Suggestions of expert panel and item impact scores are used to examine the instrument face validity. A total of eight expert panels which consist of five professional experts in the field and three experts who served in the primary school field were appointed as instrument approval panels. The findings show that (N = 8, CVR = 0.75, CVI = ?0.8) and 48 items were remained. The findings also clarify the origin and definition of content verification, content verification methods, the role of validity of content in legitimate arguments, and unresolved issues in content validation. Therefore, this version of instruments shura possesses desirable validity and reliability indices. The scale seems to measure specific aspects of quality in shura and suitable to be used as a measuring tool for the related future studies.
Ahmad, S. (2006). Pengamalan ciri-ciri kepimpinan Rasulullah SAW dalam kalangan Guru Pendidikan Islam Daerah Kota Tinggi. Master thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. (In Malay)
Aijaz, A., Aziz-un-, N., & Tayyaba, Z. (2013). Table of specification development and usage: An overview. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(12), 354-361.
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliabity of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 955-959. doi: org/10.1177%2F001316448004000419.
Cader, A. A. (2017). Islamic principles of conflict management: A model for human resource management. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 17(3), 345-363. doi:org/10.1177%2F1470595817740912.
Aksorn, T., & Hadikusumo, B. H. W. (2007). Gap analysis approach for construction safety program improvement. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 12(1), 77-79.
Al-Buraey, M. A. (1985). Administrative developmet: An Islamic perspective. Kagen Paul International Limited.
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (2002). Introduction to measurement theory. Waveland Press.
Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing. Prentice Hall.
Ayre, C., & Scally, A. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original metods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86. doi:org/10.1177%2F0748175613513808
Azhary, M. T. (1992). Negara hukum: Suatu studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya dilihat dari segi hukum Islam, impimentasinya pada periode negara Madinah dan masa kini. Bulan Bintang. (In malay)
Baker, T. L. (1994). Doing Social Research. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc
Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2005).The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique & utilization. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company
Cohen, R. J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46. doi:org/10.1177%2F001316446002000104
Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied nursing research, 5(4), 194-197.? doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.
Erdem, M. (2009). Effects of learning style profile of team on quality of materials developed in collaborative learning processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 154-171. doi:org/10.1177%2F1469787409104902
Esposito, John, L. (2003). Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford Universiti Press.
Ford, J. K., & Wroten, S. P. (1984). Introducing new methods for conducting training evaluation and for linking training evaluation to program redesign. Personnel Psychology, 37, 651-665. doi:org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00531.x
Frank-Stromberg, M., & Olsen, S. J. (2004). Instruments for clinical health-care research. Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian. Universiti Malaya. (In Malay)
Gilbert, E., & Susan, P. (2016). Making sense of methods and measurement: Lawshe’s Content validity index. Clinical Simulating in Nursing, 12, 530-531. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.08.002
Gregory, T. (2006) Introduction to research methodology. Onitsha: African, First Publishers.
Hussin, N., & Hafit, A. (2018). Green Technology: Awareness among Academic Library Employees. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 7(3), 161–177.
Ilker, E., Sulaiman, A. M., & Rukayya, S. A. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioural research. CBS Publishing.
Lawshe, C. (1975). A quantitave approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-385.
Md. Mohiden, M. J. (2013)
In-Text Citation: (Surip et al., 2019)
To Cite this Article: Surip, N. A., Razak, K. A., & Tamuri, A. H. (2019). Determining Content Validity Instruments Shura elements among Islamic Teachers in Primary Schools. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(4), 1120–1131.
Copyright: © 2019 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
