International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

search-icon

A Systematic Review of Teacher’s Perceptions and Challenges towards STEM Integrations

Open access
Numerous changes had happened towards our education systems in order to ensure that the best systems are implemented for the students. Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) are being widely used in various countries and is believed to be the best systems as for now. However, to integrate STEM, it is very important to understand teachers’ perceptions related to STEM Integration in school since teachers are the most important people that will help in delivering STEM content towards students. This study attempts to understand teachers’ perceptions and challenges experienced towards STEM integration in school by examining existing literature. Articles access from December 2015 to December 2018 across two databases Mendeley and Google Scholar were referred to. This review found that most teachers have negative perceptions towards STEM integration in school. Teachers have wrong perceptions as well towards STEM as they believe it is necessary for them to use technology for them to integrate STEM in school. Teachers also state that they experience challenges in terms of time constraints the most since integrating STEM required more time for both students and teachers to adapt well.
Bell, D. (2015). The reality of STEM education , design and technology teachers ’ perceptions?: a phenomenographic study. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9
Bernstein-sierra, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). Identifying and Overcoming Challenges in STEM Reform?: a Study of four National STEM Reform Communities of Practice.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-017-9395-x
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Teachnology and Engineering Teachers.
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers ’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
Decoito, I., & Myszkal, P. (2018). Connecting Science Instruction and Teachers ’ Self- Efficacy and Beliefs in STEM Education Connecting Science Instruction and Teachers ’ Self-E ffi cacy and. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 00(00), 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1473748
Delen, I., & Uzun, S. (2018). Matematik Ö?retmen Adaylar?n?n FeTeMM Temelli Tasarlad?klar? Evaluating STEM Based Learning Environments Created by Mathematics Pre-Service Teachers, 33(3), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018037019
El-Deghaidy, H., Mansour, N., Alzaghibi, M., & Alhammad, K. (2017). Context of STEM integration in schools: Views from in-service science teachers. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6), 2459–2484.
https://doi.org/10.12973/EURASIA.2017.01235A
English, L. D. (2017). Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x
Estapa, A. T., & Tank, K. M. (2017). Supporting integrated STEM in the elementary classroom?: a professional development approach centered on an engineering design challenge. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0058-3
Gomez, A., & Albrecht, B. (2013). True STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 73(4), 8. Retrieved from https://www.iteea.org/39191.aspx.
Guzey, S., Selcen, Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM Integration in Middle School Life Science?: Student Learning and Attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x
Guzey, Selcen, S., Moore, T. J., & Harwell, M. (2016). Building Up STEM?: An Analysis of Teacher- Developed Engineering Design-Based STEM Integration Curricular Materials, 6(1), 10–29.
Haas, P. J., & Springer, J. (1998). Applied Policy Research?: Concept and Cases. New York: Garland Publishing Co.
Judith, H. (2017). STEM. In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/STEM-education
Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121.
Lesseig, K., Nelson, T. H., Slavit, D., & Seidel, R. A. (2016). Supporting Middle School Teachers ’ Implementation of STEM Design Challenges, 177–188.
Mansour, N. (2015). Science Teachers ’ Perceptions of STEM Education?: Possibilities and Challenges, 1(1), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.1.1.51-54
Mohtar, L. E., Halim, L., Abd Rahman, N., Maat, S. M., H. Iksan, Z., & Osman, K. (2019). A Model of Interest in STEM Careers Among Secondary School Students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 404–416.
Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. (2013). Perceptions, engagements and practices of teachers seeking profesional development in place-based integrated STEM. Teacher Education and Practice, 26(2), 242–265.
Pearson, G. (2017). National academies piece on integrated STEM. Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1289781
Pryor, B. W., Pryor, C. R., & Kang, R. (2015). The Journal of Social Studies Research Teachers ’ thoughts on integrating STEM into social studies instruction?: Beliefs , attitudes , and behavioral decisions. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.201
In-Text Citation: (Azman & Maat, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Azman, A. A., & Maat, S. M. (2019). A Systematic Review of Teacher’s Perceptions and Challenges towards STEM Integrations. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 964–974.