International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

search-icon

Board Structure and Corporate’s Performance: Evidence from Private Education Companies

Open access

Mohd Waliuddin Mohd Razali, Josephine Yau Tan Hwang, Mohd Uzairi Ahmad Hajazi , Janifer Lunyai

Pages 141-156 Received: 10 Sep, 2019 Revised: 18 Sep, 2019 Published Online: 20 Oct, 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.46886/IJARPED/v8-i4/6450
This paper investigates the effect of board structure of Malaysian private educational companies towards their firm’s corporate performance. The average board size in this study is three and the percentage of women on board is about 40%. In addition, seventy six percent of the firm is having women as their director. By examining the relationship between board structure (board size and, woman on board) and the firm performance, our study shows that board size has a significant negative relationship with firm performance. However, women on board show significant positive effect on corporate performance. Our results imply that larger board will reduce firm performance, while women on board may create higher firm performance. These findings suggest that firm with large board size may encounter more agency issues in monitoring and controlling the members on board. On the other hand, firms with more women on board may have better corporate performance, as claimed by women are good in term of understand the market needs and bringing creativity and quality solution in decision making. More women in the board in some extent improve corporate performance in private education companies. The study could be extended with variables such as ownership, board meeting, director social network and other on corporate performance that could give significant interest of many stakeholders.
Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow?. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371-386.
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309.
Ahmad, M. S., Isah, N., Osman, M. R., & Abas, F. (2011). Pembangunan Kriteria Penggredan Institut Memandu di Malaysia. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/MRR 02-2011_Pembangunan kriteria penggredan institut memandu di malaysia_17Oct2011.pdf.
Alkdai, H. K., & Hanefah, M. M. (2012). Board of directors’ characteristics and value relevance of accounting information in Malaysian shariah-compliant companies: a panel data analysis. Economics and Finance Review, 2(6), 31-44.
Azeez, A. A. (2015). Corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Finance, 3(1), 180-189.
Brown, W. A. (2005). Exploring the association between board and organizational performance in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 15(3), 317-339.
Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435-451.
Carter, D. A., D'Souza, F., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2010). The gender and ethnic diversity of US boards and board committees and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(5), 396-414.
Catalyst. (2007). Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500. Equity in Business Leadership. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from
http://www.catalyst.org/system/files/census_board_final.pdf.
Dutta, P., & Bose, S. (2007). Gender diversity in the boardroom and financial performance of commercial banks: Evidence from Bangladesh, The Cost and Management 34(6), 70-74.
Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35-54.
Equal Opportunity for Women in the Workplace Agency (2006). Retrieved March 1, 2014, from https://www.wgea.gov.au/sites/default/files/Final_Annual_Report0708[1].pdf.
Erhardt, N. L., Werbel, J. D., & Shrader, C. B. (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102-111.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325.
Fauzi, F., & Locke, S. (2012). Board structure, ownership structure and firm performance: A study of New Zealand listed-firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance 8(2), 43–67.
Higgs, D. (2003). Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Nonexecutive Directors. Retrieved March 1, 2014, from
http://www.citationmachine.net/bibliographies/511592174?new=true.
Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., & Paetzold, R. L. (2000). The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaptation of board composition in response to environmental change. Journal of Management Studies, 37(2), 235-256.
Hopenhayn, H. A. (1992). Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 60(5), 1127-1150.
Hwang, I., Kim, H., & Pae, S. (2014). Equity-based compensation for outside directors and cost of equity capital. Journal of Applied Business Research, 30(1), 15-26.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. the Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880.
Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. The Journal of Risk Finance
In-Text Citation: (Razali, Hwang, Hajazi, & Lunyai, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Razali, M. W. M., Hwang, J. Y. T., Hajazi, M. U. A., & Lunyai, J. (2019). Board Structure and Corporate’s Performance: Evidence from Private Education Companies. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 141–156.