International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development

search-icon

Relationship between Teachers’ Perceptions Towards School Principals' Instructional Leadership Practices and Teachers’ Concerns about Teaching and Learning Innovation

Open access
The purpose of this study is to determine the relationships between secondary school teachers perceptions towards instructional leadership practices of their principals and teachers concern about teaching and learning innovation. The sample of the study consists of 350 secondary school teachers in Petaling Perdana, Selangor. The instruments were adapted from the The Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS) developed by Hallinger and Murphy (1985) and Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ) developed by Hall and Hord (2011). Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed to examine the relationship including frequencies, percentage, standard deviation and correlation. Data analysis indicated that there was a moderate positive correlation between teachers perceptions towards the school principal instructional leadership style and teachers concerns about teaching and learning innovation with values of r = 0.371 ** and sig 0.00 (p?0.01). A weak relationship was found in the dimension of instructional leader's role in defining a school mission. This indicates that the principals have implemented defining a school mission dimension at weak level and significant. The finding should be given serious attention with some improvement that can be made to optimise the teachers’ concerns about teaching and learning innovation.
Ahmed, U., Isa, N. M., Majid, A. H. A., Zin, M. L. M., & Amin, B. M. (2017). Towards understanding work engagement: can HR really buffer HR? Test of a moderated model. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(20), 1-18.
Ahmed, U., Majid, A. H. A., & Zin, M. L. M. (2016). HR Moderating HR: Critical link between Developmental HR Practices and work engagement in a Moderated Model. Management Review: An International Journal, 11(2), 4-22.
Ahmed, U., Umrani, W. A., Qureshi, M. A., & Samad, A. (2018). Examining the links between teachers support, academic efficacy, academic resilience, and student engagement in Bahrain. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 39-46.
Anderson, N., Poto?nik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in orga- nizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297-1333
Asrin, B. (2008). Permasalahan yang dihadapi dalam pengintegrasian teknologi maklumat dalam pengajaran bahasa di sekolah rendah. Tesis sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Azian, A. S. (2010). Leadership Behaviour and practices of a head teacher in an excellent school.
Aziz, N. A. A. (2015). Hubungan antara kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dengan komitmen untuk perubahan guru sebagai mediator dalam melaksanakan pentaksiran berasaskan sekolah. Tesis doktor falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Putra Malaysia..
Bennis, W. G. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The Strategies for Taking Charge, New York, NY:
Chandler, C. S. (2007). A Mixed Method Study on CBAM and The Adoption of Thin Client Computers By Adolescents. A Dissertation For Degree Doctor of Education, University of San Diego, San Diego.
Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cotton,K. 2003. Principals and student achievement : What the research say. Alexandria. VA : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Developmen.
Dnyaneshwar, S. (2011). Use of virtual classroom in teaching through distance mode: A case study of SCDL. ELT-India. International Journal for the Teachers of English, 1(3), 35–42
Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 529-561.
George, A. A., Hall, G. E., & Stiegelbauer, S. M. (2006). Measuring Implementation in schools: The Stages Of Concern Questionnaire
Ghavifekr, S. & Athirah, W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191.
H.Heck, R., J.Larsen, T., &A. Marcoulides, G. (1990). Instructional leadership and school
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon: Pearson Education, Inc
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lesson from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration. 49(2), 125-142.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Instructional Leadership and School Socio-Economic Status: A Preliminary Investigation. Administrator’s Notebook. 31(5), 1-4
Harper and Row.
Howard, R. W. (1987). Concepts and shemata. Philadelphia, PA: Cassell.
improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(2), 94–125.
Integration of Transformational and Instructional Leadership. Educational Administration
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013).Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan malaysia. Putrajaya.
Leithwood K. &Mascall B. (2008). Collective Leadership Effects on Student Achievement.
Marks, H. M., &Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal Leadership and School Performance : An
Mortimore, P. (1995). The positive effects of schooling. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Psychosocial disturbances in young people: Challenges for prevention (pp. 333-363). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press
Noor, A. A. M. (2007). Kepimpinan pengajaran dan efikasi kendiri pengetua sekolah menengah dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian akademik sekolah. Te
In-Text Citation: (Yunus, Abdullah, & Jusoh, 2019)
To Cite this Article: Yunus, L. M. M., Abdullah, A., & Jusoh, R. (2019). Relationship between Teachers’ Perceptions Towards School Principals’ Instructional Leadership Practices and Teachers’ Concerns about Teaching and Learning Innovation. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 22–32.