This study examines how factual materials are transformed into value articulation in the production of feature reports. From a population of 34 first-, second-, and third-prize feature reports in the 35th China Journalism Award, 10 cases were selected through purposive and maximum-variation sampling. Seventeen work-elicitation, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 creators, producing approximately 410,000 Chinese characters of transcripts. A theoretically informed codebook thematic analysis showed that facts entered the final report through the dual gate of verifiability and explanatory relevance; problem definitions and evidence gathering recursively revised one another; the functional configuration of lived experience, data, expert knowledge, and institutional materials constructed causality and responsibility; and characters, scenes, and temporal structures translated evidence into public meaning. Frames were mainly developed by reporters and were calibrated by editorial feedback and organisational norms as recalled by the creators. The study proposes an iterative mechanism of problem orientation, evidentiary constraint, narrative translation, and feedback calibration, together with the concept of evidence-constrained value articulation. It extends Entman’s textual functions into observable production practices and argues that the journalistic legitimacy of value articulation depends on evidentiary traceability, causal proportionality, and the non-substitution of narrative for evidence.
Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. M. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802–1811. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165
Boesman, J. L. J., Van Gorp, B., & d’Haenens, L. (2016). Between silence and salience: A multimethod model to study frame building from a journalistic perspective. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(4), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2016.1228864
Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade’s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
Breed, W. (1955). Social control in the newsroom: A functional analysis. Social Forces, 33(4), 326–335. https://doi.org/10.2307/2573002
Brüggemann, M. (2014). Between frame setting and frame sending: How journalists contribute to news frames. Communication Theory, 24(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12027
Carragee, K. M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.
D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 870–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02578.x
de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905056815
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. Pantheon Books.
Godler, Y., & Reich, Z. (2017). Journalistic evidence: Cross-verification as a constituent of mediated knowledge. Journalism, 18(5), 558–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915620268
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harper & Row.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. K. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
Matthes, J. (2009). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990–2005. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900908600206
Neveu, E. (2014). Revisiting narrative journalism as one of the futures of journalism. Journalism Studies, 15(5), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.885683
Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). SAGE.
Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00334.x
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Schudson, M. (2001). The objectivity norm in American journalism. Journalism, 2(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/146488490100200201
Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (2014). Mediating the message in the 21st century: A media sociology perspective (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Steensen, S. (2018). Feature journalism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.810
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. Free Press.
van Krieken, K., & Sanders, J. (2021). What is narrative journalism? A systematic review and an empirical agenda. Journalism, 22(6), 1393–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919862056
Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00329.x
Xinhua News Agency. (2025a, November 5). Results of the 35th China Journalism Award announced. https://www.news.cn/politics/20251105/2b0e635cce67494a8394f1dd5f15cff9/c.html
Xinhua News Agency. (2025b, November 5). Catalogue of winners of the 35th China Journalism Award. https://www.news.cn/politics/20251105/148cfbb711a94904b9256692d4389e55/c.html
Ping, L., & Ismail, A. B. (2026). From Factual Selection to Value Articulation: Frame-Building Mechanisms in Award-Winning Feature Reports of the 35th China Journalism Award. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(3), 1650–1703.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
