Purpose: Scientific creativity is a core component of scientific literacy, yet traditional standardized assessments show poor adaptability for primary school students and fail to capture process-based creative performance. Grounded in progressive education principles, this study aims to develop a performance-based assessment system for primary school students’ scientific creativity and verify its effectiveness, so as to fill the gap of integrated assessment framework in the field of primary science evaluation. Methodology: A mixed-methods design was adopted. A three-tier assessment framework was constructed by integrating scientific creativity theory and Williams’ creativity model (Williams, 1980). Two instruments—a 40-item Scientific Creativity Scale and a 20-item Influencing Factors Questionnaire—were developed and tested with 180 Grade 4 students from Sichuan, China. Implementation strategies for classroom practice were refined through action research.
Findings: First, the assessment framework comprises 3 first-level dimensions, 13 second-level dimensions and 27 behavioral indicators. Second, the scale achieves good reliability (Cronbach’s ? = 0.897) and validity. Third, a three-stage implementation strategy and a five-step instructional design path were proposed for science and maker courses. Fourth, students’ overall scientific creativity is above average, with higher scores in creative tendency and lower scores in divergent thinking; significant gender differences exist in curiosity and science learning interest. Implications: This study enriches the theoretical system of performance-based assessment in science education, and provides operable practical tools for progressive science education, supporting the shift from result-oriented to process-oriented evaluation in primary science classrooms.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
Hu, W., & Yu, G. (2002). A study on adolescents’ scientific creativity. Educational Research, (1), 44–48.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Compulsory education science curriculum standard (2022 edition). Beijing Normal University Press.
National Research Council. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.
Stiggins, R. J. (2005). Student-involved assessment for learning. Pearson.
Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9), 703–713.
Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. DOK Publishers.
Zhou, W. (2019). Understanding and implementation of performance-based assessment. Jiangsu Education, (14), 7–11.
Tian, M., & Nasri, N. M. (2026). Performance-Based Assessment of Scientific Creativity among Primary School Students: Framework Development and Practical Verification. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(3), 1069–1076.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode