Young learners often hold misconceptions about living and non-living things, especially when they rely on visible movement rather than biological characteristics. This study compared two-dimensional and three-dimensional animation videos as visual learning supports for Year One science learning and examined their effects on science achievement and higher-order thinking skills. A quasi-experimental pre-test-post-test design was conducted with 58 pupils from two Malaysian primary schools. School A used two-dimensional animation (n = 30), whereas School B used three-dimensional animation (n = 28) over eight weeks. Data were collected using a 40-item achievement test and a 30-item age-appropriate higher-order thinking skills test and analyzed using paired-samples t-tests and analysis of covariance. Both groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test. After controlling for pre-test scores, the three-dimensional group achieved significantly higher science achievement than the two-dimensional group, F(1,57) = 22.362, p < .001, partial eta squared = .282. However, no significant difference was found for higher-order thinking skills, F(1,55) = 0.160, p = .690. The findings suggest that three-dimensional animation can strengthen early science understanding, while higher-order thinking requires guided questioning, discussion, and reasoning tasks beyond visual format alone.
Almanasreh, E., Moles, R., & Chen, T. F. (2019). Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 15(2), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066
AlShaikh, R., Al-Malki, N., & Almasre, M. (2024). The implementation of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning in the design and evaluation of an AI educational video assistant utilizing large language models. Heliyon, 10(3), Article e25361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25361
Amprazis, A., Papadopoulou, P., & Malandrakis, G. (2021). Plant blindness and children’s recognition of plants as living things: A research in the primary schools context. Journal of Biological Education, 55(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1667406
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Cavanagh, T. M., Chen, R., & Bathgate, A. (2022). Using commonly available technologies to create online multimedia lessons through the lens of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Applied Instructional Design, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.59668/223.7805
Du, L., Tang, X., & Wang, J. (2024). Different types of textual cues in educational animations: Effect on science learning outcomes, cognitive load, and self-efficacy among elementary students. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12929-z
Jaun-Holderegger, B., Lehnert, H. J., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2022). Knowledge and perception of common local wild plant and animal species by children and their teachers: A case study from Switzerland. International Journal of Science Education, 44(8), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2076949
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: How many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9150-7
Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Duangngern, P., Gessala, N., & Sarakan, P. (2024). Promoting analytical thinking skills development in elementary school students through animated cartoons. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, Article 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100467
Lin, T. C., Hsu, Y. H., & Lin, M. S. (2022). A co-word analysis of selected science education literature: Identifying research trends in scaffolding. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7), 1407–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10209-1
Ljubojevic, M., Vaskovic, M., & Stankovic, S. (2025). Improving the efficiency of multimedia learning and reducing cognitive load. Applied Sciences, 15(3), Article 1054. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031054
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Molina, A. I., Navarro, A., Ortega, M., & Lacruz, M. (2018). Evaluating multimedia learning materials in primary education using eye tracking. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 59, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.02.004
Mou, T. Y. (2023). Science learning with designed animation: Investigation of primary school children’s attitudes toward science learning, animation integration, and understanding level. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, Article 100246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100246
Rahmawati, F., & Ramadan, Z. H. (2021). Improving high-level thinking skills in students through Powtoon-based animation video media. Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.41037
Said, N. A. M., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Yaacob, A. R. (2022). A content validity calculation steps based on expert panel judgment. Education in Medicine Journal, 14(3), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2022.14.3.6
Shudayfat, E. A., & Alsalhi, N. R. I. (2023). Science learning in 3D virtual environment multi-users online in basic education stage. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), Article em2216. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12809
Sibarani, I. S., Damanik, D. M., Rahmadani, P., & Sari, C. F. (2024). The influence of animation media on the learning outcomes of Grade 3 students in science subjects at Elementary School 091635 Kerasaan. International Journal of Scientific Multidisciplinary Research, 2(9), 1329–1340. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijsmr.v2i9.10628
Tenenbaum, H. R., & Van Herwegen, J. (2024). Young children’s science learning from a touchscreen app. International Journal of Early Years Education, 32(2), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2023.2259422
Tepla, M., Teply, P., & Smejkal, P. (2022). Influence of 3D models and animations on students in natural subjects. International Journal of STEM Education, 9, Article 65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00382-8
Wang, X., Lin, L., Han, M., & Spector, J. M. (2020). Impacts of cues on learning: Using eye-tracking technologies to examine the functions and designs of added cues in short instructional videos. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, Article 106279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106279
Yanti, F. A., & Thohir, M. A. (2024). Higher order thinking skills in science learning: A systematic review from 2014-2023. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2419–2427. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28082
Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6
Zakirman, Z., Rahayu, C., & Gusta, W. (2022). E-animation media to improve the understanding of elementary school science learning. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3411–3419. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2595
Alzahrani, H. F. J., Baharudin, S. M., Yakob, N., & Mustafa, Z. (2026). Animation Formats for Year One Science Learning. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 15(3), 444–456.
Copyright: © 2026 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
