Recently, a growing body of research in psychology, psycho-linguistics and neuroscience has posed a challenge to the traditional view of language comprehension by proposing that cognitive states are not disembodied in language comprehension. Embodied theories of cognition hold that the actual mechanisms underlying language comprehension is hypothesized to entail performing mental simulations of its content. Numerous empirical researches have emerged in support of embodied view of language comprehension. While nowadays there is no single view of embodied cognition, its theories share many characteristics and assumptions (Wilson, 2002) and one of the most influential is Barsalou’s (1999) Perceptual Symbol System, which proposes that people activate and manipulate perceptual symbols during language comprehension even when the perceptual characteristics are merely implied rather than explicitly stated. The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of how sensory-motor and affective processes contribute to language comprehension.
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol system. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
Barsalou, L. W., Simmons, W. K., Barbey, A., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 84-91.
Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 129-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beauchamp, M. S., & Martin, A. (2007). Grounding object concepts in perception and action. Cortex, 43, 461-468.
Bergen, B., Chang, N., & Narayan, S. (2004). Simulated Action in an Embodied Construction Grammar. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
Bergen, B., & Chang, N. (2005). Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation -Based Language Understanding. In J.-O. Ostman & M. Fried (Eds.), Construction Grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions. John Benjamins.
Biederman, I., and Ju, G. (1988). Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition. Cognit. Psychol. 20, 38-64
Borhi, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32, 863-873.
Bouvier, S. E., & Engel, S. A. (2006). Behavioral deficits and cortical damage loci in cerebral achromatopsia. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 183-191.
Burgess, C., & Lund, K. (1997). Modeling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language and Cognitive Processes, 12, 177-210.
Capitani, E. (2009). Posterior cerebral artery infarcts and semantic category dissociations: A study of 28 patients. Brain, 132, 965-981.
Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V., & Martin, A. (1999). Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 913-919.
Chouinard, P. A., & Goodale, M. A. (2010). Category-specific neural processing for naming pictures of animals and naming pictures of tools: An ALE meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 48, 409-418.
Connell, L. (2007). Representing object colour in language comprehension. Cognition, 102, 476-485.
Daniel A. W. (2010). Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 41, 294-304.
De Vega, M. (2008). Levels of embodied meaning. From pointing to counterfactuals. In AM. Glenberg, M. de Vega, & AC. Graesser (eds.), Symbol, Embodiment, and Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eskenazi, T., Grosjean, M., Humphreys, G. W., & Knoblich, G. (2009). The role of motor simulation in action perception: A neuropsychological case study. Psychological Research, 73, 477-485.
Engelen, J. A. A., Bouwmeester, S., de Bruin, A. B. H., & Zwaan, R. A. (2011). Perceptual simulation in developing language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110 (4), 659-675.
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gainotti, G. (2006). Anatomical, functional, and cognitive determinants of semantic memory disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 577-594.
Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3, 317-333.
Glenberg, A., & Robertson, D. (2000). Symbol Grounding and Meaning: A Comparison of High-Dimensional and Embodied Theories of Meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 379-401.
Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 588-565.
Gibbs, R. W. Jr.?2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2006). Statistics for the Behavioral Science (7th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
Hoffman, P., & Ralph, L. M. A. (2013). Shapes, scents and sounds: Quantifying the full multi-sensory basis of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia, 51, 14-25.
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermuller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41(2), 301-307.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundation of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
language processing. Cognitive Science, 30, 733-744.
Kemmerer, D. (2015). Cognitive Neuroscience of Language. New York: Psychology Press.
Kosslyn, S., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. (2001). Neural foundations of imagery. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 2, 635-642.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A parading for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lallee, S., Madden, C., Hoen, M., & Dominey, P. F. (2010). Linking language with embodied and teleological representations of actions for humanoid cognition. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 4(8), 1-12.
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representations of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-240.
Louwerse, M. M., & Ventura, M. (2005). How children learn the meaning of words and how LSA does it. Journal of Learning Sciences, 14, 301-309.
Louwerse, M. M., & Connell, L. (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35, 381-398.
Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 273-302.
Martin, A. (2007) the representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 25-45.
Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48, 788-271.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1976). Computer science as empirical enquiry: Symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19, 113-126.
Oleksandr, V. H., Jean-Christophe, G., Maria, C., & Grzegorz, P. (2014) From demonstration to theory in embodied language comprehension: A review. Cognitive Systems Research, 29-30, 66-85.
Pecher, D., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Introduction to grounding cognition. Grounding cognition: the role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Verifying conceptual properties in different modalities produces switching costs. Psychological Science, 14, 119-124.
Pulvermuller, F. (2008). Grounding language in the brain. In M. De Vega, A. Graesser, & A. M. Glenberg (Eds.) Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 85-116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. A., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. (2011). The mechanics of embodiment: A dialogue on embodiment and computational modeling. Frontiers in Cognition, 2(5), 1-21.
Pezzulo, G., & Calvi, G. (2011). Computational explorations of perceptual symbol systems theory. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 275-297.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
Pulvermuller, F., Haerle, M., & Hummel, F. (2001). Walking or Talking? Behavioral and Neurophysiological Correlates of Action Verb Processing. Brain and Language, 78, 143-168.
Schank, R. C. (1972). Conceptual dependency: A theory of natural language understanding. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 552-631.
Standfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153-156.
Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2008). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 183-190.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six view of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636.
Zeki, S. (1990). A century of achromatopsia, Brain, 113, 1721-1777.
Zeki, S. (1997). Cerebral akinetopsia (visual motion blindness): A review. Brain, 114, 811-824.
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35-62). New York: Academic Press.
Zwaan, R. A., Standfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehends routinely represent the shape of objects? Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.
Zwaan, R. A., Taylor, L. J. Jr. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 135, 1-11.
In-Text Citation: (Wang, & Pan, 2017)
To Cite this Article: Wang, H., & Pan, Y. (2017). A Brief Review on Embodied Language Comprehension. International Journal of Academic Research in Psychology. 4(1), 30-42.
Copyright: © 2017 The Author(s)
Published by Knowledge Words Publications (www.kwpublications.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
