International Journal of Academic Research in Environment and Geography

search-icon

A Brief Review of Ethical Perspectives towards water pollution in the Malacca River

Open access
Malacca is a historical place and appropriate to travel. Suddenly, water pollution became an issue to affect the state’s economy. This situation happened due to the human development and has various negative implications for the environment. Manufacturing activities, human sewage and livestock waste may cause river water to become polluted. Even human have the right to use the water, but they don’t have the right to damage the water resource. Accordingly, this article seeks to explore Malacca River pollution from an ethical perspective views. These ethical values involve prescriptivism and moral realism, God and religion ethics, human consequentialism ethics or deontology ethics, and the example of good human beings. Applying ethical perspective toward human activities may sustain the health of water in the Malacca River.
Alexander, L., and Moore, M. W. (2012), “Deontological Ethics”. The Stanford of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.), retrieved from
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/ethicsdeontological.
Armstrong, A. (2006). Ethical Issues in Water Use and Sustainability. Area-The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers), 38 (1), pp. 9-15.
Boyd, R. N. (1988), “How to be a Moral Realist”, in Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey. Essays on Moral Realism, Cornell University Press, pp. 181-228.
EU. (2000). Directive 2000/60 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy EU, Luxembourg.
Fletcher, J. F. (1966), “Situation Ethics, The New Morality”. Westminster John Knox Press, 176p.
Gleick, P. H. (1993), Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World’s Freshwater Resources. Oxford University Press, p.13.
Gleik, P. H. (1998). Water in Crisis: Paths to Sustainable Water Use. Ecological Applications, 8 (3), pp. 571-579.
Gleick P. (1999), The human rights to water. Water Policy, Vol. 1, pp. 487-503.
Hare, R. M. (1989), “Essays in Ethical Theory.” Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Hursthouse, R. (2012). “Virtue Ethics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/ethics-virtue.
Jackson, R. B., Carpenter, S. R., Dahm, C. N., McKnight, D. M., Naiman, R. J., Postel, S. L., Running, S. W. (2001), Water in a Changing World. Ecological Application, 11(4), pp. 1027-1045.
Kant, I. (1780), The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics, Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott.
Leopold, A. (1949), A Sand Country almanac, Oxford University Press Special edition commemorative edition, with Sketches here and there Finch R. ed 1987 Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Manuwadi, H. (1988), Heavy Metals and Other Non-Oil Pollution in Southeast Asia. Ambio, 17 (3), pp. 178-182.
Muhammad, R. M. (1996), Towards an Islamic Approach for Environment Balance. Islamic Economic Studies, 3 (2), pp. 57-76.
Norzela, N. N. (2010), Sungai Melaka Tercemar, Utusan, retrieved from
http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.asp?y=2010&dt=0123&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Seatan&pg=ws_01.htm
Al-Din, S. J., AbdalRahman. (1337H), Al-Jamia al-Sagheer, Cairo, pp. 97.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2012), Consequentialism, The Stanfod Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved from
http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/consequentialism/.
In-Text Citation: (Hua & Marsuki, 2015)
To Cite this Article: Hua, A. K., & Marsuki, M. Z. (2015). A Brief Review of Ethical Perspectives towards Water Pollution in the Malacca River. International Journal of Academic Research in Enviornment & Geography, 2(1), 1–7.