This study aims to test the effect of participatory budgeting and procedural fairness on the manager's commitment and performance either have simultaneous or partial effect. The method of the research used was a survey method that conducted at the pawnshop in North Sumatra with the respondents of the managers in branch offices. The data used is primary data by collecting data through questionnaires. The analysis method used is descriptive-analytical verification. The effect model analyzed by using a structural equation model to analyze the pattern of causal relationships between variables and determine the direct, indirect and total effect of some variables. The results showed that participatory budgeting and procedural fairness simultaneously have a significant and positive effect on the manager’s commitment; participatory budgeting has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s commitment; procedural fairness has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s commitment; participatory budgeting, procedural fairness and manager’s commitment simultaneously has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance; the effect of participatory budgeting has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance; the procedural fairness has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance; the manager’s commitment has a significant and positive effect on the manager’s performance.
Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s)
Published by Human Resource Management Academic Research Society (www.hrmars.com)
This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. The full terms of this license may be seen at: http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode
